메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Sophie Welsch (Institute for Experimental and Clinical Research) Antoine Harvengt (Institute for Experimental and Clinical Research) Paola Gallo (Saint-Luc University Clinics) Manon Martin (Louvain Institute of Biomolecular Science and Technology (IBST) Unit) Dominique Beckers (CHU-UCL Namur sites Saint-Elisabeth and Mont-Godinne) Thierry Mouraux (CHU-UCL Namur sites Saint-Elisabeth and Mont-Godinne) Nicole Seret (Clinique CHC MontLégia) Marie-Christine Lebrethon (CHU of Liège site ND-des Bruyères) Raphaël Helaers (Human Molecular Genetics, de Duve Institute, UCLouvain) Pascal Brouillard (Human Molecular Genetics, de Duve Institute, UCLouvain) Miikka Vikkula (Human Molecular Genetics, de Duve Institute, UCLouvain) Philippe A. Lysy (Institute for Experimental and Clinical Research, UCLouvain)
저널정보
대한당뇨병학회 Diabetes and Metabolism Journal Diabetes and Metabolism Journal Vol.48 No.5
발행연도
2024.9
수록면
949 - 959 (11page)
DOI
10.4093/dmj.2023.0166

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: Recent diabetes subclassifications have improved the differentiation between patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus despite several overlapping features, yet without considering genetic forms of diabetes. We sought to facilitate the identification of monogenic diabetes by creating a new tool that we validated in a pediatric maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) cohort.Methods: We first created the DIAgnose MOnogenic DIAbetes (DIAMODIA) criteria based on the pre-existing, but incomplete, MODY calculator. This new score is composed of four strong and five weak criteria, with patients having to display at least one weak and one strong criterion.Results: The effectiveness of the DIAMODIA criteria was evaluated in two patient cohorts, the first consisting of patients with confirmed MODY diabetes (<i>n</i>=34) and the second of patients with T1DM (<i>n</i>=390). These DIAMODIA criteria successfully detected 100% of MODY patients. Multiple correspondence analysis performed on the MODY and T1DM cohorts enabled us to differentiate MODY patients from T1DM. The three most relevant variables to distinguish a MODY from T1DM profile were: lower insulin-dose adjusted A1c score ≤9, glycemic target-adjusted A1c score ≤4.5, and absence of three anti-islet cell autoantibodies.Conclusion: We validated the DIAMODIA criteria, as it effectively identified all monogenic diabetes patients (MODY cohort) and succeeded to differentiate T1DM from MODY patients. The creation of this new and effective tool is likely to facilitate the characterization and therapeutic management of patients with atypical diabetes, and promptly referring them for genetic testing which would markedly improve clinical care and counseling, as well.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0