지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article discusses the legal and practical problems arising from the assignment of contractual rights and obligations, with particular emphasis on binding nature of arbitration agreements for assignees. By considering the needs and risks of international commercial relations, it is true that arbitration is the most suitable mechanism to solve such legal disputes. However since, as all contracts do, arbitration clauses or arbitration agreements also derive their validity from parties’ mutual consent one should be extra cautious while determining their validity and bindingness against assignees or other third parties in general. This study analyzes impacts of contract’ assignments on validity of arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism against assignees in a comparative way and in light of recent judicial decisions from various jurisdictions. Arbitration as a contractual right is also subject to transfer of underlying contract. Since arbitration clause is separate from validity of main contract due to separability doctrine, the author underlines that it should be arbitral tribunal itself to decide on validity of transfer and whether transferee has right to initiate arbitration against debtor in light of kompetenz- kompetenz doctrine. In that regard privity of contract should not be used as an excuse to invalidate arbitration clause stipulated in the underlying contract upon the transfer. This study examines both court cases and arbitral awards in a comparative approach to support this dominant view. Thus, it concludes that arbitration clause is directly related to the right to sue under dispute resolution clauses of contracts, so it should be deemed as an accessory of the assigned contractual right.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Language of Arbitration Agreements and Availability of Class Arbitration: Focusing on the U.S. Supreme Court's Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela Decision
중재연구
2021 .09
-
Korean case analysis of compelling arbitration in the United States
중재연구
2018 .01
-
Impacts of Contractual Rights’ Assignment on Arbitration Agreements
한국무역학회 학술대회
2023 .08
-
Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards under England Arbitration Act
중재연구
2021 .09
-
Research on the Expansion of the Effect of Arbitration Agreements in China
중재연구
2024 .09
-
中国国际商事仲裁协议效力认定问题研究
중재연구
2018 .01
-
한국 중재산업 발전 방안
중재연구
2018 .01
-
중재 활성화를 위한 중재비용 구조제도의도입 방안 연구 - 민사소송법상 소송구조에 착안하여 -
중재연구
2024 .03
-
Recent changes to the Korean Arbitration Act and its Comparison with Singapore: Korea’s Potential to Become an Arbitration Hub
중재연구
2016 .01
-
Study on Drafting Appropriate Dispute Resolution Clause in International Contract
중재연구
2019 .01
-
Arbitration Clause Prohibiting Class Action in Consumer Contracts
중재연구
2017 .01
-
영국중재법상 해사중재와 관련된 LMAA 중재의 시사점에 관한 연구
해양비즈니스
2018 .01
-
CISG and Arbitration Agreements: A Janus-Faced Practice and How to Cope with It
중재연구
2015 .01
-
In Search of How to Improve Consumer Arbitration in South Korea
중재연구
2024 .09
-
A Study on the Amended Arbitration Law of Mongolia
중재연구
2017 .01
-
Abuse of Process and Regulation in Commercial Arbitration – A Chinese Perspective
중재연구
2015 .01
-
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ARBITRATION : A SOUTH-KOREAN AND COMPARATIVE APPROACH
국제거래와 법
2019 .01
-
소비자 중재합의의 유효성 : 미국판례를 중심으로
무역상무연구
2018 .02
-
Navigating the Digital Maze - Pertinent Issues in E‐Arbitration
중재연구
2017 .01
-
중국 중재제도의 새로운 발전과 외국중재판정 승인 및 집행에 관한 연구
중재연구
2015 .01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0