지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국국방연구원 The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis Vol.36 No.3
- 발행연도
- 2024.9
- 수록면
- 279 - 301 (23page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Why did the ROK–U.S. alliance go through a process of alleviation by finding consensus rather than dividing when facing conflict over missile guidelines? What underlying principles operated between the two countries? This study aims to address these questions. As a result of a literature review, an analysis of the process of moving from conflict to alleviation in the Missile Guidelines along the timeline from the Park Chung-hee administration to the Kim Dae-jung administration, the Lee Myung-bak administration, and finally the Moon Jae-in administration shows that the occurrence of a “policy tradeoff” led to the transition from conflict to deescalation. Here, the author introduces the concept of a “policy tradeoff,” which in this study refers to the exchange of policies to maintain cooperative relations amid conflicting national principles. Through a case analysis, the author finds conflicting principles of “self-defense” in the ROK and “non-proliferation” in the United States. Consequently, the ROK aligned with the non-proliferation principle of the United States by pursuing denuclearization while the United States relaxed missile development restrictions in alignment with the ROK’s self-defense principle. The purpose was to transition the phase of conflict between the two nations regarding the ROK’s missile development to a phase of cooperation. Here, the ROK–U.S. Missile Guidelines underwent a gradual shift from conflict to cooperation based on the notion of a “policy tradeoff.”
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
60 Years of Normalization of ROK-Japan Diplomatic Relations: Achievements and Challenges
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2025 .01
-
The Future Direction of the US-ROK Alliance
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .08
-
전시작전통제권 전환과 한미동맹의 변화
국방연구
2016 .03
-
건국절 제정의 타당성과 추진방안
法學論文集
2015 .01
-
대한민국 헌법 하에서 북한식 연방제 통일의 위헌성
法學論文集
2016 .01
-
Proposing Key Concepts of the ROK’s National Security Strategy
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .11
-
The 2020 NPT Review Conference and the Role of the ROK
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2019 .01
-
The New ROK-U.S. Nuclear Cooperation Agreement: Its Significance and Tasks
IFANS BRIEF
2015 .05
-
ROK-US Cooperation in an Era of US-China Strategic Competition
EAI 이슈브리핑
2019 .11
-
美 사회통합형 용도지역제(Inclusionary Zoning)의 우리나라 도입에 관한 연구
부동산학보
2015 .01
-
The U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense Policy In Europe and the Asia-Pacific : Strategic Implications for the ROK-U.S. Alliance
EAI 이슈브리핑
2015 .10
-
Crisis Management Cooperation as a New Platform for ROK-EU Relations
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .11
-
North Korea between China, Japan and the ROK, 2012–2016
Korea Journal
2018 .09
-
김정은 체제의 실상과 우리의 전략적 접근
한국국가전략
2020 .01
-
ROK’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and Its Commitment to Cooperation with ASEAN
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2023 .06
-
Completing the U.S.-Japan-Korea Alliance Triangle: Prospects and Issues in Japan-Korea Security Cooperation
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2016 .01
-
냉전 시대로의 회귀? 윤석열 정부의 대러정책과 한·러 관계
국제지역연구
2024 .10
-
미래 한미동맹 발전을 위한 조약법적 검토 : 미군기지 정화책임을 중심으로
국제법학회논총
2019 .03
-
The Vietnam War, Korea’s Opportunity for More Reliable Security Assurances
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2015 .01
-
The Transition of Wartime Operational Control for Entering a New Era
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2021 .01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0