메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Tae-Gyu Kim (Chonnam National University) Na Yun Seo (Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences) Young-Jin Jung (Chonnam National University) Jang Woo Park (Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences)
저널정보
한국자기학회 Journal of Magnetics Journal of Magnetics Vol.29 No.4
발행연도
2024.12
수록면
467 - 473 (7page)
DOI
10.4283/JMAG.2024.29.4.467

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulate using low-intensity currents in the range of 0-2 mA technique. tDCS is widely used to treat brain nervous system disorders such as depression and stroke. The effectiveness of tDCS depends on various parameters that affect the electromagnetic stimulation, especially the type of electrode. This study explores how the shape of the electrode affects the focus of the electromagnetic stimulation in tDCS. For the simulation, average head model of a 20-24year old male from Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) in the south korea was used. Three electrode configurations were tested: (1) two circle pad electrodes, (2) one circle pad and needle electrode, and (3) two needle electrodes. The electromagnetic simulations were performed in MATLAB 2022b based on the finite element method (FEM), assigning the same electrical conductivity to the human tissue and the electrodes. The results showed that the needle electrodes provided more focused electromagnetic stimulation compared to the conventional pad electrodes, showing a reduction in the electric field and current density. These findings highlight the important role of electrode geometry in influencing electric field and current density distribution during tDCS and suggest that needle electrodes may improve the precision of neuromodulation interventions by improving focality.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Methods and Materials
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092106850