메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이시형 (대한상공회의소) 이지웅 (국립부경대학교)
저널정보
한국기후변화학회 한국기후변화학회지 Journal of Climate Change Research Vol.15 No.6
발행연도
2024.12
수록면
1,159 - 1,166 (8page)
DOI
10.15531/KSCCR.2024.15.6.1159

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
On August 29, 2024, the Constitutional Court of Korea issued a decision of nonconformity regarding Article 8, Paragraph 1 of the Carbon Neutrality Act, mandating a quantitative specification of the emissions pathway between the 2030 Nationally Determined Contribution and the 2050 net-zero target. This ruling is expected to stimulate extensive academic and policy discussions on the necessary pathway. While the exact shape of the emissions pathway may vary according to philosophical approach, three primary forms can be considered: concave, linear, and convex. This study employs optimal control theory to clarify the form and characteristics of an optimal emissions pathway. Cost minimization is the preferred criterion, acknowledging that the optimal pathway may differ depending on the selected criterion. The resulting emissions pathway is convex and downward-sloping, indicating that greenhouse gas reductions should be implemented as early as feasible. The pace of reduction is dependent on the relative magnitude of the social cost of carbon and mitigation costs: a larger social cost of carbon results in a more pronounced convex emissions pathway. Determining the exact shape of the optimal emissions path requires knowledge of the values of both the social cost of carbon and mitigation costs, which are still subjects of ongoing debate. Consequently, this study suggests that the government should establish a plausible range for these two costs, rather than seeking scientifically exact values, to determine the emissions path for the period 2031 ~ 2049.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 헌법재판소 판결 경과
3. 온실가스 최적 배출 경로 도출
4. 결론
Reference

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092171240