메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
남승우 (영산대학교) 허광욱 (영산대학교) 김종경 (영산대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제33권 제6호 (인문사회과학 편)
발행연도
2024.12
수록면
398 - 410 (13page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2024.12.33.6.398

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study conducted a one-group cross-sectional design on healthcare workers to identify the structural causal relationship between risk factors(privacy risk, economic risk) of healthcare device and service use and innovation resistance, perceived usefulness, and personal acceptance. The subjects of this study were citizens or employees working in healthcare-related industries. The results of the study are as follows. H1. The hypothesis was rejected because privacy risk did not affect innovation resistance (β=.105, t=1.620). H2. The hypothesis was accepted because privacy risk had a negative effect on perceived usefulness (β=-.170, t=2.400*). H3. The hypothesis was accepted because privacy risk was analyzed to have a positive effect on personal acceptance (β=.100, t=2.530*). H4. Economic risk was analyzed to have a positive effect on innovation resistance (β=.330, t=5.131*), and the hypothesis was accepted. H5. Economic risk did not affect perceived usefulness (β=0.038, t=0.490), and the hypothesis was rejected. H6. Economic risk did not affect personal acceptance (β=-0.037, t=0.743), and the hypothesis was rejected. H7. Innovation resistance was analyzed to have a negative effect on perceived usefulness (β=-.180, t=2.626**), and the hypothesis was accepted. H8. Innovation resistance was found to have no effect on personal acceptance (β=0.009, t=0.152), so the hypothesis was rejected. H9.
Perceived usefulness was found to have a positive effect on personal acceptance (β=.673, t=15.684***), so the hypothesis was accepted. H10: Through the verification of 9 mediating effects, 4 mediating effects were confirmed.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결과
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092117540