메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최형석 (한국세라믹기술원)
저널정보
한국신뢰성학회 신뢰성응용연구 신뢰성응용연구 제24권 제4호
발행연도
2024.12
수록면
376 - 383 (8page)
DOI
10.33162/JAR.2024.12.24.4.376

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: This study aimed to enhance the reliability of bead-type negative temperature coefficient (NTC) thermistors by identifying failure mechanisms and developing improvement measures. Comparative life tests were conducted on thermistors before and after improvements to assess reliability improvements.
Methods: The relationship between temperature and resistance was evaluated using a temperature recorder and resistance meter. Failure analysis was conducted using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), X-ray, and optical microscopy. The findings revealed that thermal shock caused expansion and contraction of the internal thermal conductive epoxy, inducing mechanical stress on the thermistor component that led to fatigue failure. The primary failure mechanism was identified as grain boundary fractures, rather than intragranular fractures, caused by thermal shock, which resulted in gradual resistance increases.
Results: To mitigate thermal stress, an epoxy with a 57% lower thermal expansion coefficient was used. Comparative life testing confirmed a 64% increase in the relative lifespan of the improved samples, validating the hypothesized failure mechanism. The thermal stress from epoxy with a high thermal expansion coefficient was identified as the primary cause of failure of bead-type NTC thermistors under fluctuating temperature conditions.
Conclusion: Applying a thermally conductive epoxy with a thermal expansion coefficient closer to that of the thermistor effectively mitigated thermal stress, extending the device’s average lifespan. This adjustment shifted the failure mechanism to wear failure, significantly enhancing overall reliability.

목차

1. 서론
2. 신뢰성 설계
3. 실험
4. 비교수명시험 결과
5. 결론
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-091262019