지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.11
- 수록면
- 466 - 473 (8page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Backgrounds/Aims: Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been used to assess surgery quality, educate, and evaluate surgical performance using video recordings in the minimally invasive surgery era. Much attention has been paid to automating surgical workflow analysis from surgical videos for an effective evaluation to achieve the assessment and evaluation. This study aimed to design a deep learning model to automatically identify surgical phases using laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos and automatically assess the accuracy of recognizing surgical phases.
Methods: One hundred and twenty cholecystectomy videos from a public dataset (Cholec80) and 40 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos recorded between July 2022 and December 2022 at a single institution were collected. These datasets were split into training and testing datasets for the AI model at a 2:1 ratio. Test scenarios were constructed according to structural characteristics of the trained model. No pre- or post-processing of input data or inference output was performed to accurately analyze the effect of the label on model training.
Results: A total of 98,234 frames were extracted from 40 cases as test data. The overall accuracy of the model was 91.2%. The most accurate phase was Calot’s triangle dissection (F1 score: 0.9421), whereas the least accurate phase was clipping and cutting (F1 score: 0.7761).
Conclusions: Our AI model identified phases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a high accuracy.
Methods: One hundred and twenty cholecystectomy videos from a public dataset (Cholec80) and 40 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos recorded between July 2022 and December 2022 at a single institution were collected. These datasets were split into training and testing datasets for the AI model at a 2:1 ratio. Test scenarios were constructed according to structural characteristics of the trained model. No pre- or post-processing of input data or inference output was performed to accurately analyze the effect of the label on model training.
Results: A total of 98,234 frames were extracted from 40 cases as test data. The overall accuracy of the model was 91.2%. The most accurate phase was Calot’s triangle dissection (F1 score: 0.9421), whereas the least accurate phase was clipping and cutting (F1 score: 0.7761).
Conclusions: Our AI model identified phases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a high accuracy.
목차
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Comment on: “Deep learning-based surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy”
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2025 .02
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Early complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Comparison of the outcomes of robotic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .10
-
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy : History and overview
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using mini laparoscopic instruments
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Know-how of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Patients
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
ArtiSential® laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single- fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which minimally invasive surgery is better?
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2025 .02
-
Influencing factors in patient satisfaction of critical pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy : A survey analysis
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .05
-
Clinical Implication of Bile Culture after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Multimodal practices to reduce pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: How can we do better?
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2016 .04
-
[Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgery] A Single Center’s Initial Experiences of Single-port Robotic Cholecystectomy and Single-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparison of Surgical Outcomes
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Surgical strategies of laparoscopic cholecystectomy; anatomical landmarks
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Comparison of Single-Incision Robotic Cholecystectomy versus conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a single Center
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2023 .05
-
How to do single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using LEAN BACK Technique?
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2015 .09
-
Laparoscopic extended cholecystectomy for T2 gallbladder cancer
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
How to reduce the hospitalization in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Personal experience and limitation in practice
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2016 .04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-091049678