지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 동향자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.10
- 수록면
- 1 - 7 (0page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Supply chain disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the vulnerability of supply chains that are concentrated in certain countries around the world, and have led to policies prioritizing economic security and reducing dependence on certain countries. Major developed countries have been pursuing reshoring strategies to rebuild their domestic production base, while also aiming to establish reliable supply chains through “friend-shoring” with trusted partner countries. This recent movement of supply chain restructuring, summarized as geoeconomics fragmentation, has particularly intensified in strategic technology sectors related to security.
While the Korean government's participation in friend-shoring policies by some developed countries is not intended to exclude China from supply chains, it is true that participating in cooperative frameworks with those countries may lead to worsening relations with China. As the U.S. continues to expand its efforts to restructure supply chains excluding China, it may prove difficult to deepen economic relations with China, which could lead to a decrease in Korea’s national interests.
Against this backdrop, ASEAN holds high strategic value as a cooperative partner in the midst of the U.S.-China rivalry. ASEAN plays a central role in political, security, economic, and socio-cultural cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region through mechanisms like the East Asia Summit (EAS), ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), ASEAN Defense Ministers' Meeting Plus (ADMM-Plus), and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Through such mechanisms centered on ASEAN, it is expected that cooperation in East Asia can be sought without directly facing sensitive issues within the U.S.-China strategic competition. Therefore, this study attempted to explore ways to cooperate with ASEAN in the context of U.S.-China rivalry.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The impact of forward and backward GVC participation on China’s OFDI in ASEAN
동남아시아연구
2021 .08
-
ASEAN's medium- to long-term trade strategies and the direction of RoK-ASEAN cooperation
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2023 .03
-
Analysis on 2017 ASEAN-related Summits : focused on ASEAN Plus Three, ASEAN-Korea, EAS
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .12
-
지정학 관점에서 본 림랜드 아세안(ASEAN)의 가치와 미?중 경쟁
동남아연구
2020 .01
-
Assessment of 2015 ASEAN Summits: Focusing on ASEAN, ASEAN+3, and EAS
IFANS BRIEF
2015 .12
-
Analysis of 2016 ASEAN-Related Summits: On ASEAN, ASEAN+3, and the EAS
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .10
-
ASEAN-ROK Partnership: What’s next after the New Southern Policy?
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2022 .08
-
중국과 아세안의 공급망 안보 협력에 관한 연구
중소연구
2022 .11
-
ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community and Policy Implications for Korea
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2020 .08
-
The Media in Asia: ASEAN and Korea-China-Japan
연구보고서
2019 .12
-
Towards Advanced Korea-ASEAN Economic Cooperation in Turbulent Times
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2025 .02
-
2017년 ASEAN 관련 정상회의 결과분석: ASEAN+3, 한-ASEAN, EAS를 중심으로
주요국제문제분석
2017 .12
-
2015 ASEAN 관련 정상회의 결과분석: ASEAN, ASEAN+3, EAS를 중심으로
주요국제문제분석
2015 .12
-
2016년 ASEAN 관련 정상회의 결과분석: ASEAN, ASEAN+3, EAS를 중심으로
주요국제문제분석
2016 .11
-
2018년 ASEAN 관련 정상회의 결과분석 : 한-ASEAN, ASEAN+3, EAS를 중심으로
주요국제문제분석
2018 .12
-
Korea’s ODA to Southeast Asia
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2015 .06
-
The Study of New Southward Policy Responsive e-Business Strategy for the ASEAN Market Penetration Expansion
e-비즈니스연구
2018 .10
-
중국의 대(對)아세안 국제개발협력과 일대일로구상
한중사회과학연구
2021 .10
-
한국과 대만의 對아세안 경제정책 비교
비교경제연구
2019 .01
-
Assessment of the 2018 ASEAN Summit : Takeaways from the Korea-ASEAN, ASEAN+3, and East Asia Summits
IFANS FOCUS
2018 .12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0