지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第171輯
- 발행연도
- 2024.9
- 수록면
- 375 - 417 (43page)
- DOI
- 10.18622/kher.2024.09.171.375
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper summarizes the existing research on ‘the early modern’ and presents my own views based on it. It can be said that the discussions of Wallerstein, Frank, and Pomerantz show some consistent flow, although their issues are different. Their discussions are common in that they view the global economy after the 16th century as a center of a trade network between multiple countries rather than a one-country history, and that the difference in development between Europe and China does not result in the nature of each society, but rather in its position in the trade network, that is, an external factor. It was found that Europe’s dominance was gradually very accidental as the times went back.
Konan Naito and Ichisada Miyazaki defined the period from the Song Dynasty to before the Opium War as ‘the early modern’. Accordingly, new suggestions were made on the definition of ‘the early modern’ from the 1990s. Mio Kishimoto defined Chinese society with high liquidity as the ‘the early modern’ after it was incorporated into the silver economy in the 16th century until the Opium War. Hiroshi Miyajima argues that the Neo-Confucianism established in a small-farm society has ‘confucian modernity.’
This paper classifies the period from the early Song dynasty to the mid-Ming dynasty as “the earlier early modern,” and from the mid-Ming dynasty to the Opium War as “the later early modern, ” with an aim to clarify the characteristics of each. The earlier early modern was centered on trade with East and Southeast Asia, and the later early modern era was a period when trade with the West began in earnest.The stronger the liquidity, the greater the unity of civil society for survival, and the state power had no choice but to neglect it. However, when the Qing emperor had strong authority, integration was possible, but the Revolution of 1911 made this impossible.
This self-reform was impossible in the modern era, and eventually became the object of overthrow by Mao Zedong, and disappeared after 1949. Again, after 1949, it can be said that modern Chinese history began with the question of how to control excessive liquidity in the later early modern period.
Konan Naito and Ichisada Miyazaki defined the period from the Song Dynasty to before the Opium War as ‘the early modern’. Accordingly, new suggestions were made on the definition of ‘the early modern’ from the 1990s. Mio Kishimoto defined Chinese society with high liquidity as the ‘the early modern’ after it was incorporated into the silver economy in the 16th century until the Opium War. Hiroshi Miyajima argues that the Neo-Confucianism established in a small-farm society has ‘confucian modernity.’
This paper classifies the period from the early Song dynasty to the mid-Ming dynasty as “the earlier early modern,” and from the mid-Ming dynasty to the Opium War as “the later early modern, ” with an aim to clarify the characteristics of each. The earlier early modern was centered on trade with East and Southeast Asia, and the later early modern era was a period when trade with the West began in earnest.The stronger the liquidity, the greater the unity of civil society for survival, and the state power had no choice but to neglect it. However, when the Qing emperor had strong authority, integration was possible, but the Revolution of 1911 made this impossible.
This self-reform was impossible in the modern era, and eventually became the object of overthrow by Mao Zedong, and disappeared after 1949. Again, after 1949, it can be said that modern Chinese history began with the question of how to control excessive liquidity in the later early modern period.
목차
1. 序言
2. 중심에서 주변으로: 월러스틴, 프랑크, 포메란츠
3. 유동성과 소농사회 사이에서
4. 중국 근세의 두 가지 시기: 전기 근세와 후기 근세
5. 結語
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동양적 근세
동국사학
2024 .04
-
근세 조선의 형성 : 나의 책을 말한다
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
유학을 중심으로 본 근세･근대 일본사상사 논점 －2010년대 이후의 연구－
한국사상사학
2021 .01
-
“근세 일본의 재해와 사자처리”에 대한 토론문
동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2023 .05
-
[중국 근세Ⅱ] 명청시대사 연구의 심화와 확장
역사학보
2018 .09
-
근세전기 ‘そなた’와 그 주변어에 관한 고찰
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2019 .04
-
여성의 글/쓰기, 생산과 재생산- 근세 시대 영국을 중심으로
한국고전여성문학연구
2017 .01
-
조선왕조의 정책사와 근세 실학, 그리고 金堉(1580∼1658)
한국실학연구
2019 .01
-
[중국 근세Ⅱ] ‘중국’의 ‘경계’를 넘나드는 연구 지형 : 현황과 발전 가능성
역사학보
2016 .10
-
근세 조일 관계 속 쓰시마 번 裁判의 역할
동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2023 .05
-
‘Early Modern Period’ in Comprehensive History
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2024 .06
-
[중국근세Ⅱ] 주변부가 중심이 된 명청사 연구
역사학보
2020 .09
-
Towards Environmental History of Modern East Asia
한국과학사학회지
2021 .08
-
중국어사와 국어사의 융합연구－근대중국어 어휘의 전파를 중심으로－
중국어문학
2019 .01
-
표류기를 통해 본 동아시아 해역의 근세 세계화
인문사회과학연구
2024 .02
-
[중국근세Ⅱ] 지속과 확장의 사이에서: 명청사연구의 방향과 출로
역사학보
2024 .09
-
[중국 근대] 최근 중국근대사 연구의 현황과 과제 : 새로운 주제와 방법론의 모색
역사학보
2016 .10
-
[토론문] “근세 조일 관계 속 쓰시마 번 裁判의 역할”에 대한 토론문
동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2023 .05
-
[중국 근대] 연구 분야의 지속과 확장 : 중국근대사 연구(2016~17)와 대만사 연구(2013~17)
역사학보
2018 .09
-
국가 발행제하 고등학교 국사 교과서 근대 서사 프레임의 구조와 특징
역사교육
2019 .06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-090936789