지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.8
- 수록면
- 381 - 387 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Backgrounds/Aims: Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is increasingly recognized for its advantages over the inpatient approach, which advantages include cost-effectiveness and faster recovery. However, its acceptance is limited by patient concerns regarding safety, and the potential for postoperative complications. The study aims to compare the operative and postoperative outcomes of ambulatory LC versus inpatient LC, specifically addressing patient hesitations related to early discharge.
Methods: In a retrospective analysis, patients who underwent LC were divided into ambulatory or inpatient groups based on American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, age, and the availability of postoperative care. Propensity score matching was utilized to ensure comparability between the groups. Data collection focused on demographic information, perioperative data, and postoperative follow-up results to identify the safety of both approaches.
Results: The study included a cohort of 220 patients undergoing LC, of which 48 in each group matched post-propensity score matching. The matched analysis indicated that ambulatory LC patients seem to experience shorter operative times and reduced blood loss, but these differences were not statistically significant (35 minutes vs. 46 minutes, p -value = 0.18; and 8.5 mL vs. 23 mL, p -value = 0.14, respectively). There were no significant differences in complication rates or readmission frequencies, compared to the inpatient cohort.
Conclusions: Ambulatory LC does not compromise safety or efficacy, compared to traditional inpatient procedures. The findings suggest that ambulatory LC could be more widely adopted, with appropriate patient education and selection criteria, to alleviate concerns and increase patient acceptance.
Methods: In a retrospective analysis, patients who underwent LC were divided into ambulatory or inpatient groups based on American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, age, and the availability of postoperative care. Propensity score matching was utilized to ensure comparability between the groups. Data collection focused on demographic information, perioperative data, and postoperative follow-up results to identify the safety of both approaches.
Results: The study included a cohort of 220 patients undergoing LC, of which 48 in each group matched post-propensity score matching. The matched analysis indicated that ambulatory LC patients seem to experience shorter operative times and reduced blood loss, but these differences were not statistically significant (35 minutes vs. 46 minutes, p -value = 0.18; and 8.5 mL vs. 23 mL, p -value = 0.14, respectively). There were no significant differences in complication rates or readmission frequencies, compared to the inpatient cohort.
Conclusions: Ambulatory LC does not compromise safety or efficacy, compared to traditional inpatient procedures. The findings suggest that ambulatory LC could be more widely adopted, with appropriate patient education and selection criteria, to alleviate concerns and increase patient acceptance.
목차
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Early experience of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Thailand
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
A retrospective single-center study comparing clinical outcomes of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2019 .11
-
The evaluation of feasibility of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy using intraoperative instillation of bupivacaine: a retrospective observational study
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2024 .07
-
Clinical outcome for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in extremely elderly patients
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2015 .02
-
Comparison of the outcomes of robotic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .07
-
Feasibility and safety of day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy : a single-institution 5-year experience of 1140 cases
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2015 .08
-
고령의 대퇴 전자간 골절에서 근위 대퇴 골수정 삽입술 후 보행 회복에 미치는 인자
대한정형외과학회지
2017 .10
-
외래간호사 역량 증진을 위한 간호역량 평가도구 개발
간호행정학회지
2017 .01
-
Prediction of Ambulatory Status After Hip Fracture Surgery in Patients Over 60 Years Old
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
2016 .01
-
The efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without discontinuation in patients on antithrombotic therapy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .03
-
Ambulatory Impedance-pH Assessment Is the Industry Standard But Is It Always the Best Choice?
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (JNM)
2024 .04
-
Who experiences endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease?
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2016 .05
-
Single-stage laparoendoscopic management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: A retrospective study comparing starting with ERCP versus with laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2025 .02
-
Inpatient or outpatient total elbow arthroplasty: a comparison of patient populations and 30-day surgical outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
대한견주관절의학회지
2023 .12
-
Clinical Safety of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Elderly Patients: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Aged 65 to 79 Years and over 80 Years
Journal of Acute Care Surgery
2020 .01
-
Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block according to the difference in bupivacaine concentrations for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
2023 .04
-
Advantages of Robotic Single-Site Cholecystectomy Compared to Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy : Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Using a Propensity Score Matching
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Impact of scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis, following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2017 .02
-
Influencing factors on postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2016 .02
-
Postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-090277904