메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
홍원표 (국립의료원) 김중희 (서울대학교) 이승효 (소방청) 조영진 (서울대학교) 이은경 (서울대학교)
저널정보
연세대학교 의과대학 Yonsei Medical Journal Yonsei Medical Journal Vol.65 No.3
발행연도
2024.3
수록면
174 - 180 (7page)
DOI
10.3349/ymj.2023.0341

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Prehospital telecardiology facilitates early ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) detection, yet its widespread im plementation remains challenging. Extracting digital STEMI biomarkers from printed electrocardiograms (ECGs) using phone cameras could offer an affordable and scalable solution. This study assessed the feasibility of this approach with real-world pre hospital ECGs. Materials and Methods: Patients suspected of having STEMI by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) were identified from a policy research dataset. A deep learning-based ECG analyzer (QCGTM analyzer) extracted a STEMI biomarker (qSTEMI) from prehos pital ECGs. The biomarker was compared to a group of human experts, including five emergency medical service directors (board certified emergency physicians) and three interventional cardiologists based on their consensus score (number of participants an swering “yes” for STEMI). Non-inferiority of the biomarker was tested using a 0.100 margin of difference in sensitivity and specificity. Results: Among 53 analyzed patients (24 STEMI, 45.3%), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of qSTEMI and consensus score were 0.815 (0.691–0.938) and 0.736 (0.594–0.879), respectively (p=0.081). Sensitivity, specificity, positive pre dictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of qSTEMI were 0.750 (0.583–0.917), 0.862 (0.690–0.966), 0.826 (0.679–0.955), and 0.813 (0.714–0.929), respectively. For the consensus score, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.708 (0.500–0.875), 0.793 (0.655–0.966), 0.750 (0.600–0.941), and 0.760 (0.655–0.880), respectively. The 95% confidence interval of sensitivity and specificity differences between qSTEMI and consensus score were 0.042 (-0.099–0.182) and 0.103 (-0.043–0.250), respectively, confirming qSTEMI’s non-inferiority. Conclusion: The digital STEMI biomarker, derived from printed prehospital ECGs, demonstrated non-inferiority to expert con sensus, indicating a promising approach for enhancing prehospital telecardiology.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0