메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jaewon Na (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) Young Eun Chung (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) Il-Yeo Jang (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) Yoo-Young Lee (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) Tae-Joong Kim (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) Jeong-Won Lee (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) Byoung-Gie Kim (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) Chi-Son Chang (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine) Chel Hun Choi (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
저널정보
대한산부인과학회 Obstetrics & Gynecology Science Obstetrics & Gynecology Science Vol.67 No.2
발행연도
2024.3
수록면
243 - 252 (10page)
DOI
10.5468/ogs.23238

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective Geriatric patients requiring gynecological surgery is increasing worldwide. However, older patients are at higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality, particularly cardiopulmonary complications. Laparoscopic surgery is widely used as a minimally invasive method for reducing postoperative morbidities. We compared the outcomes of open and laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries in patients older than 55 years.Methods We included patients aged >55 years who underwent gynecological surgery at a single tertiary center between 2010 and 2020, excluding vaginal or ovarian cancer surgeries were excluded. Surgical outcomes were compared between the open surgery and laparoscopic groups, with age cutoff was set at 65 years for optimal discriminative power. We performed linear or logistic regression analyses to compare the surgical outcomes according to age and operation type.Results Among 2,983 patients, 28.6% underwent open surgery and 71.4% underwent laparoscopic surgery. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery were better than those of open surgery in all groups. In both the open and laparoscopic surgery groups, the older patients showed worse overall surgical outcomes. However, age-related differences in perioperative outcomes were less severe in the laparoscopic group. In the linear regression analysis, the differences in estimated blood loss, transfusion, and hospital stay between the age groups were smaller in the laparoscopy group. Similar results were observed in cancer-only and benign-only cohorts.Conclusion Although the surgical outcomes were worse in the older patients, the difference between age groups was smaller for laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery offers more advantages and safety in patients aged >65 years.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0