메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이정임 (배재대학교)
저널정보
한국의류산업학회 한국의류산업학회지 한국의류산업학회지 제26권 제1호
발행연도
2024.2
수록면
44 - 54 (11page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this study, the sizing systems of 40 unisex sweatshirt brands were analyzed to collect the size informationneeded to produce unisex clothing. Each size specification was compared with the body size distribution and percentiles of menand women aged 18 to 29. Depending on the brand, unisex sweatshirt sizes ranged from 1 to 8. Despite being unisex apparel,three brands offered only one or two sizes. Out of the brands surveyed, 50% were found to offer four or five sizes. Out of the40 brands, 25 used letters such as “S,” “M,” and “L” to indicate the size designation. More than 92.5% of the brands includedM and L, and the sizing system tended to focus on larger sizes such as XL and 2XL rather than smaller sizes such as XS andS. The size specifications of shoulder width, chest circumference, sleeve length, and total length were compared with the bodysize distribution and percentiles of men and women aged 18 to 29. The distribution of each size specification mostly appearedin a section larger than the men’s body size. The size specifications of unisex sweatshirts were set close to or larger thanmen’s sizes and hardly represented women’s sizes. To increase consumer satisfaction with unisex clothing, establishing a sizestandard that could accurately reflect the body size distribution of men and women was found to be imperative. Such a sizestandard could also help each brand specify or diversify its target and differentiate itself with other brands.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0