지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.5
- 수록면
- 79 - 109 (31page)
- DOI
- 10.38080/crh.2024.05.147.79
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since 2003, the ‘Northeast Project’ known in Korean society has included content that describes Koguryeo history as a ‘local regime’ of Chinese dynasties. This came as a significant shock to Koreans who, through their national education curriculum, firmly believed that Koguryeo was a state belonging to their ancient national history. In response, besides administrative measures by the government, academic responses were undertaken by the Korean scholarly community, including presentations and publications. However, the initial responses from the government and academia were criticized for narrowly focusing on the issue of historical affiliation and the limited topic of Koguryeo history while addressing the political issue of the ‘Northeast Project’.
Subsequently, fundamental critiques of the present perception of ‘national history’ emerged, and discussions on this issue have taken place within academia. It has been pointed out that the present perception of ‘national history’, which had been maintained complacently in Korean society, inevitably causes friction with the historical perceptions of neighboring countries and does not align with the rapid transition to a multicultural society. Triggered by the ‘Northeast Project’ incident, there have been strong calls for a shift in the research direction of academia, which has been focused on overcoming colonial historiography and establishing a new ‘Korean history’ since liberation, as well as in the education system based on this research. Going forward, it is necessary to critically reflect on the existing Korean history framework, share its limitations, and seek ways to establish and narrate a new ‘Korean history’.
Subsequently, fundamental critiques of the present perception of ‘national history’ emerged, and discussions on this issue have taken place within academia. It has been pointed out that the present perception of ‘national history’, which had been maintained complacently in Korean society, inevitably causes friction with the historical perceptions of neighboring countries and does not align with the rapid transition to a multicultural society. Triggered by the ‘Northeast Project’ incident, there have been strong calls for a shift in the research direction of academia, which has been focused on overcoming colonial historiography and establishing a new ‘Korean history’ since liberation, as well as in the education system based on this research. Going forward, it is necessary to critically reflect on the existing Korean history framework, share its limitations, and seek ways to establish and narrate a new ‘Korean history’.
목차
1. 머리말
2. ‘동북공정’에 대한 정부와 학계의 초기 대응
3. 민족사 중심 ‘국사(國史)’ 인식의 기원과 폐해
4. 근대적 역사 인식의 한계와 대안 모색
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089812255