지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국중원언어학회 언어학 연구 언어학연구 제71호
- 발행연도
- 2024.4
- 수록면
- 39 - 60 (22page)
- DOI
- 10.17002/sil..71.202404.39
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to examine whether Zeijlstra’s (2004, 2008, 2012) reverse or upward Agree for Negative Concord (NC) can be still a viable option for Korean NC. Reverse/Upward Agree allows a Goal with an interpretable feature to check its c-commanding Probe with an uninterpretable feature (cf. Wurmbrand, 2011). Reverse/Upward Agree seems to obtain an advantage over standard downward Agree (Chomsky, 2000, 2001) in that it explains the negativity of a fragment negative concord item (NCI hereafter) under the Identity Condition on ellipsis, where a covert operator with an interpretable feature [iNeg] checks off NCIs with an uninterpretable feature [uNeg]. I, however, argue that the standard Chomskyan downward Agree (Chomsky, 2000, 2001), where multiple NCIs with the [uNeg] look down their matching Goal with the [iNeg], is still able to capture NC in Korean, and that downward Agree is better to explain distinctiveness of Korean NCIs that outscope negation and asymmetrically c-command it. This paper also hints that the interpretation of NCIs in a fragmentary environment is heavily dependent on pragmatics, rather than syntax, opting for Chung (2012).
목차
1. Introduction
2. Overview of Reverse/Upward Agree
3. Problems of Reverse/Upward Agree
4. Korean NC as Downward Agree
5. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089701202