지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.3
- 수록면
- 147 - 171 (25page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2024.3.101.147
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Chinese Communist Party(hereafter CCP) has changed its attitude to ‘Chinese Nation’ in its own history. Early CCP suggest ‘Federal China’ based on independent relationship between Han and other ethnic minors. However, since war against Japan, CCP changed its attitude to ethnic minors and ‘Chinese nation’. ‘Chinese Nation’ was newly approved under the name of ‘The Big family of Chinese Nation’. On the other hand, ‘Federal China’ and ‘independence of ethnic minority’ was throughly denied. The change had its own logical bases. First, anti-imperialism was important and inherited logic in composing “The Big family of the Chinese Nation”. Rhetoric that ‘Chinese Nation’ must defeat imperialist and recover its supremacy over stolen territory successfully justified Chinese annexation of ethnic minors’ before and after the Communist revolution. Second, CCP diffrentiated their ‘amalgamation(ronghe)’ from prior ‘assimilation(tonghua)’. According to CCP, as being ‘Chinese nation’. assimilation in Qing dynasty and Nationalist could not be as complete as amalgamation. Unlike assimilation, ‘amalgamation’ acknowledged the difference between ethnics in china because it regard current ‘Chinese nation’ as something ongoing. Third, socialism also played its role for legitimacy of ‘The Big family of Chinese nation’. CCP asserted that self-determination doctrine of Marxism–Leninism was denied by Marxism–Leninism itself as it gives higher priority to revolution than self-determination. On the condition that imperialist who want frustration of revolution in China, seduced ethnic minorities to give up Chinese revolution by being apart from China and getting self determination, their independence should be abandoned for the greater good of communist revolution. When confronted with the fact that Soviet Union had the federal system with nominal self determination of ethnic groups, CCP emphasized the historical, cultural, and economical difference between China and Soviet Union. The three logical base of CCP’s ‘The Big family of Chinese Nation’, anti-imperialism, amalgamation(ronghe), and Marxism–Leninism, has continuity and discontinuity from ‘Chinese nation’ of modern China, which means naturalization of Marxist–Leninist party of China.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 中華民族論과 中國共産黨
Ⅲ. 中華民族大家庭: 계승, 단절, 마르크스-레닌주의 요소
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089619923