지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.2
- 수록면
- 112 - 118 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
All diagnostic X-ray equipments in dental clinics must undergo a radiation safety inspection upon initial installation and every three years thereafter. The objective of this study was to propose an appropriate inspection cycle based on the results of safety management inspection for dental diagnostic X-ray equipment.
The subject of this study was the radiation safety management inspection results of 774 X-ray equipments at 88 dental clinics. The period of use of the X-ray equipment was analyzed using the device type, inspection date, installation date, manufacturing date, approval date, date of discontinuation of use, transfer date, and disposal date. The X-ray equipment composition comprised 477 intraoral units, 143 panoramic units, 134 CBCT units, and 20 other radiographic units. In equipment suitability classification, out of 774 devices, 98.7% (764devices) were deemed suitable, and 1.3% (10 devices) were deemed unsuitable. Among the 10 unfit devices, one (0.8%) had a lifespan of 9 years, two (1.8%) had 12years, three (5.4%) had 15years, one (4.3%) had 18 years, two (18.2%) had 21years, and one (100%) had 27 years.
The subject of this study was the radiation safety management inspection results of 774 X-ray equipments at 88 dental clinics. The period of use of the X-ray equipment was analyzed using the device type, inspection date, installation date, manufacturing date, approval date, date of discontinuation of use, transfer date, and disposal date. The X-ray equipment composition comprised 477 intraoral units, 143 panoramic units, 134 CBCT units, and 20 other radiographic units. In equipment suitability classification, out of 774 devices, 98.7% (764devices) were deemed suitable, and 1.3% (10 devices) were deemed unsuitable. Among the 10 unfit devices, one (0.8%) had a lifespan of 9 years, two (1.8%) had 12years, three (5.4%) had 15years, one (4.3%) had 18 years, two (18.2%) had 21years, and one (100%) had 27 years.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구 대상 및 방법
Ⅲ. 연구 결과
Ⅳ. 총괄 및 고안
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
장애인 치과진료에 대한 치과위생사의 인식과 교육 필요성
서영주
,
양송이
,
궁화수
외 1명
대한치과의료관리학회지
2023
.12
치과위생사의 조직문화가 치위생업무성과에 미치는 영향
노은미
대한치과의료관리학회지
2023
.12
대한치과의료관리학회지의 역사와 연구경향 분석
김훈
,
황수정
대한치과의료관리학회지
2023
.12
치과용 세라믹 수복재료에 대한 검토 및 최신 동향
변선미
,
김경선
,
신재우
외 6명
대한치과재료학회지
2024
.03
방사선치료를 받는 유방암 환자의 피로 영향요인
황수영
,
권소희
기본간호학회지
2024
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0