지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第261輯
- 발행연도
- 2024.3
- 수록면
- 131 - 176 (46page)
- DOI
- 10.16912/tkhr.2024.03.261.131
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, I try to compare the military rulers in their ways of seizing, legitimizing and exercising of power in the reign of King Myeongjong, and to clarify the political implications of the differences among them. Basically the military rulers, who emerged through coups rather than legal procedures, could maintain and expand their power as long as they secured a sufficient military power, otherwise they could collapse at any time. These characteristics influenced the ways in which the military rulers legitimized and exercised their political power.
Since the existence of the military rulers was not legally regulated, they had to secure legitimacy of their power from the king or other military officials. The military rulers who seized power by force lacked legitimacy of the exercise of power, which made most of them legitimize the exercise of power by taking government offices. In addition, since the scope of the military rulers’ political power was not legally defined, it was up to each military ruler to decide whether and to what extent to utilize government offices. Furthermore, they illegally exercised power in the areas beyond the authority of their official position, such as personnel appointments and criminal punishment.
In short, the legally not defined power made the differences in the process of justifying and exercising of power.
Since the existence of the military rulers was not legally regulated, they had to secure legitimacy of their power from the king or other military officials. The military rulers who seized power by force lacked legitimacy of the exercise of power, which made most of them legitimize the exercise of power by taking government offices. In addition, since the scope of the military rulers’ political power was not legally defined, it was up to each military ruler to decide whether and to what extent to utilize government offices. Furthermore, they illegally exercised power in the areas beyond the authority of their official position, such as personnel appointments and criminal punishment.
In short, the legally not defined power made the differences in the process of justifying and exercising of power.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 무신집권자의 등장과정과 집권 정당화
Ⅲ. 무신집권자의 권력 행사 양상
Ⅳ. 나가며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089598787