지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.12
- 수록면
- 91 - 115 (25page)
- DOI
- 10.29163/jmed.2023.12.36.3.91
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Previous studies of Samuel Beckett’s oeuvre have been intensively explored from an existentialist perspective, but this paper aims to investigate a comparative study on the view of death between Beckett and Heidegger. The two have some things in common. So to speak, they are interested in ontology and explore the meaning of existence, or of life. Although the view of death between the two are based on human finitude and the death of self, Heidegger and Beckett have a different view of death
Death is Dasein’s ownmost possibility in Heidegger’s fundamental ontology of Being and Time. Death which leads life to nothing is not just the end of life but reveals the meaning of life. The meaning of death consists in the possibility of Being (Sein). With death, Dasein (human being) stands before himself in his ownmost potentiality-for-Being. Death, as the end Dasein, is Dasein’s ownmost possibility-non-relational, certain, and as such indefinite, not to be outstripped. Moreover, Dasein’s anticipation (Vorlaufen) of his own death means an ontological possibility to recover his authentic self.
In contrast, Beckett’s dramatic works are filled with a desperate plight in view of the fact that protagonists can’t find their existence. They who lacks their existential awakening do not realize the possibility-of-Being through death. Rather, protagonists wish for death to stop the pain of his existence, but death is permanently postponed to them. Beckett seems to say that your life is a death-in-life, you are not born yet until you have an existential awakening. As a result, death is Dasein’s ownmost possibility in Heidegger’s existential view, but in via of death Dasein can’t reach the possibility-of-Being in Beckett’s pessimistic view of death.
Death is Dasein’s ownmost possibility in Heidegger’s fundamental ontology of Being and Time. Death which leads life to nothing is not just the end of life but reveals the meaning of life. The meaning of death consists in the possibility of Being (Sein). With death, Dasein (human being) stands before himself in his ownmost potentiality-for-Being. Death, as the end Dasein, is Dasein’s ownmost possibility-non-relational, certain, and as such indefinite, not to be outstripped. Moreover, Dasein’s anticipation (Vorlaufen) of his own death means an ontological possibility to recover his authentic self.
In contrast, Beckett’s dramatic works are filled with a desperate plight in view of the fact that protagonists can’t find their existence. They who lacks their existential awakening do not realize the possibility-of-Being through death. Rather, protagonists wish for death to stop the pain of his existence, but death is permanently postponed to them. Beckett seems to say that your life is a death-in-life, you are not born yet until you have an existential awakening. As a result, death is Dasein’s ownmost possibility in Heidegger’s existential view, but in via of death Dasein can’t reach the possibility-of-Being in Beckett’s pessimistic view of death.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
하이데거의 존재론의 길에서 본 죽음과 생명의 문제
최태관
신학과세계
2023
.12
하이데거의 존재 사유에서 ‘시작’(Dichten)과 ‘사유’(Denken)의 관계 : 우위관계의 문제를 중심으로
김동한
철학연구
2024
.02
하이데거와 사르트르의 현상학적 신체론 : 『졸리콘 세미나』 와 『존재와 무』 를 중심으로
우정민
현상학과 현대철학
2023
.12
현상학의 사태에 대한 후설과 하이데거의 다른 이해
박현정
현상학과 현대철학
2023
.09
한국 하이데거 철학 연구의 진일보 : 고명섭 『하이데거 극장』(전2권), 한길사 2022
한충수
창작과비평
2023
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0