지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.12
- 수록면
- 87 - 123 (37page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study reviews selective findings of recent historical-critical studies on the origin of Islam and the Qur’an and sheds some insights on a new understanding of Islam. Modern historical-critical approaches to the origin of Islam and the Qur’an have cast significantly reasonable doubts on the traditional Islamic narratives because of the unreliable historical authenticity of the basic Islamic resources that backed up the traditional Islamic narratives. These Islamic resources with great authority include the Qur’an, Hadiths, Sira, asbāb al-nuzūl, and classical commentaries. The first problem of these resources is the late dates of their original writing or editing even in remote cultural contexts from the original Arabian peninsula in the early 7th century.
Therefore, historical-critical approaches, represented by revisionist school in this paper, have used a different set of evidences to trace back the origin of Islam and the Qur’an. Some of the primary evidence include archaeological evidences such as coins, rock inscriptions, epigraphy, numismatics; historical documents written by non-Muslims in the early- or mid-7th century about the Arab invasions. Based on these historical evidences, the traditional Islamic narratives lose the credibility because all these new evidences do not support them.
Some historical-critical scholars have proposed alternative theories about the origin of Islam based on their studies and historical evidences available. These views are not agreed on by all critical scholars, but they carry enough weight to challenge Muslims to reconsider their original historical resources and defend their traditional position with more convincing evidences. This also carries a significant implication for Christians who are engaged in Muslims in sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ in terms of understanding Islam from a new perspective without uncritically admitting what Muslims have been claiming about Islam and its origin.
Therefore, historical-critical approaches, represented by revisionist school in this paper, have used a different set of evidences to trace back the origin of Islam and the Qur’an. Some of the primary evidence include archaeological evidences such as coins, rock inscriptions, epigraphy, numismatics; historical documents written by non-Muslims in the early- or mid-7th century about the Arab invasions. Based on these historical evidences, the traditional Islamic narratives lose the credibility because all these new evidences do not support them.
Some historical-critical scholars have proposed alternative theories about the origin of Islam based on their studies and historical evidences available. These views are not agreed on by all critical scholars, but they carry enough weight to challenge Muslims to reconsider their original historical resources and defend their traditional position with more convincing evidences. This also carries a significant implication for Christians who are engaged in Muslims in sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ in terms of understanding Islam from a new perspective without uncritically admitting what Muslims have been claiming about Islam and its origin.
목차
I. 서론
II. 역사비평학과 이슬람학
III. 이슬람 기원에 관한 역사비평학적 연구들
IV. 결론: 역사비평학적 연구 결과들이 이슬람 이해에 주는 시사점
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
마호메트, 세계사를 바꾼 문제적 인물
오귀환
나침반 36.5도
2016
.05
이슬람 종교와 정신
황의갑
철학과 현실
2011
.06
절제된 균형으로 설명되는 이슬람의 다양한 이야기 : 황의현 지음,『대체로 무해한 이슬람 이야기: 천의 얼굴을 가진 이슬람문명의 위대한 모험』(씨아이알, 2023)을 읽고
김형훈
아시아리뷰
2024
.04
이슬람의 탄생과 초기역사
칼 하인츠 올리히
,
이영덕
신학전망
2017
.03
이슬람의 분열과 다양성의 역사 이해와 PCK 선교적 과제
정승현
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2025
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089361146