지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)
2014
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Silence could be symbol of unyielding resistance or apathetic indifference upon its context. Restoring the political and social conditions of 1970’s developed around monochorome painting, the rhetoric of its ‘Korean Modernism’ such as fine art detached from any other social realities, spiritual emptiness, hermit’s asceticism, or abstinence of Taoism, could not be read as itself. The achievement of monochrome painting could be discursive reproduction of political and economical dynamics of 1970’s as well as cultural and artistic breakthrough.Behind the transcendental silence, artists of monochrome could find out not only an aesthetic retreat from social oppressions but also an artistic alignment with the political dictatorship of Yushin government imposed by President Park Jeong-Hee. While ignoring political conflicts and social struggles, they showed smart response to the opportunities of international exhibitions, and got successful careers in commercial art market which newly developed in Korean art scene replacing the academicism of National Art Exhibition. They engaged in exclusive aestheic formalism which had flourished in America especially after World War Ⅱ, then found out safe and comfortable refuge in the Korean tradition carefully selected and encouraged by Korean government. As a result, they blocked out different ways of art and experiments of avant-garde as well as modernization of different traditions.The ‘Korean Modernism’ of Monochrome painting was restricted achievement of specific social groups and artists. It was a product of alliance between enforced ‘modernization’ and invented ‘tradition’ under the censorship of military government. They never resolved and overcame the dilemma of post-colonial modernizaion, that derived from double subjects of Western forms and Korean tradition. As a most successful Korean Modern Art, Monochrome painting erased out the possibilities of different ways of modern art, challenges of pluralism, voices of different classes and genders. Then in 1980’s Korean art scene witnessed the strong reaction of people’s art, ‘Minjungmisool’, which arguing social and political participation. The confrontation between Monochrome and Minjungmisool continued until the emergence of ‘New Generation’ in the mid 1990’s.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (45)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0