지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국소년정책학회 소년보호연구 소년보호연구 제19권
- 발행연도
- 2012.6
- 수록면
- 129 - 165 (37page)
- DOI
- http://dx.doi.org/
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Zero tolerance imposes automatic punishment for infractions of a stated rule, with the intention of eliminating undesirable conduct. Zero-tolerance policies forbid persons in positions of authority from exercising discretion or changing punishments to fit the circumstances subjectively; they are required to impose a pre-determined punishment regardless of individual culpability, extenuating circumstances, or history. This pre-determined punishment need not be severe, but it is always meted out.Zero-tolerance policies are studied in criminology and are common in formal and informal policing systems around the world. The policies also appear in informal situations where there may be sexual harassment or Internet misuse in educational and workplace environments.Zero-tolerance policies have been adopted in schools and other education venues around the world. These policies are usually promoted as preventing drug abuse and violence in schools. In schools, common zero-tolerance policies concern possession or use of drugs or weapons. Students, and sometimes staff, parents, and other visitors, who possess a banned item or perform any prohibited action for any reason are automatically punished. School administrators are barred from using their judgment, reducing severe punishments to be proportional to minor offenses, or considering extenuating circumstances. Consequently, these policies are sometimes derided as "zero-intelligence policies". There is no credible evidence that zero tolerance reduces violence or drug abuse by students. The unintended negative consequences are clearly documented and sometimes severe: school suspension and expulsion result in a number of negative outcomes for both schools and students.Although the policies are "facially neutral", minority children are the most likely to suffer the negative consequences of zero tolerance.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (29)
참고문헌 신청
국무총리실 / 2012 / 학교폭력근절 종합대책
강경래 / 2010 / 소년비행억제정책으로서의 Teen Court에 관한 고찰 / 소년보호연구 15 : 31 ~ 61
박기태 / 2001 / 지역사회경찰활동의 기초이론 연구 - 깨어진 유리창이론과 문제지향적경찰활동의 고찰 - / 경찰학연구 (1) : 98 ~ 121
Alicia C. Insley / 2001 / Suspending and Expelling Children from Educational Opportunity : Time to Reevaluate Zero Tolerance Policies / American Univ. L. R 50
American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force / 2008 / Are Zero Tolerance Policies Effective in the Schools?: An Evidentiary Review and Recommendations
강경래 / 2010 / 소년비행억제정책으로서의 Teen Court에 관한 고찰 / 소년보호연구 15 : 31 ~ 61
박기태 / 2001 / 지역사회경찰활동의 기초이론 연구 - 깨어진 유리창이론과 문제지향적경찰활동의 고찰 - / 경찰학연구 (1) : 98 ~ 121
Alicia C. Insley / 2001 / Suspending and Expelling Children from Educational Opportunity : Time to Reevaluate Zero Tolerance Policies / American Univ. L. R 50
American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force / 2008 / Are Zero Tolerance Policies Effective in the Schools?: An Evidentiary Review and Recommendations
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0