지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 동향자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.1
- 수록면
- 1 - 12 (0page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The United Nations Security Council adopted eight resolutions from 2012 to 2019, in condemning threatening actions on the part of North Korea, such as conducting ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons tests. I examine the efficacy of sanctions against North Korea using satellite nighttime lights data. The political system of North Korea is defined as suryong dictatorship, in which the dictator (supreme leader or suryong) holds absolute power to dictate the country’s resources. Suryong allocates large enough fraction of the country’s resources to the selectorate for supporting his political power. I empirically test the theoretical hypothesis - the ruler will transfer a greater fraction of the country’s resources to the selectorate as sanctions intensify - using satellite nighttime lights data. I find that an additional sanction is associated with an increase in the difference in nighttime lights between the capital city, Pyongyang, and the rest of the country by about 0.4 percent. Manufacturing cities, mining areas, the Chinese border region, and Sinuiju become relatively brighter with an additional sanctions event. Another notable finding is the estimate on the interaction term with the nuclear development facilities areas, which suggests that the ruler diverts resources and electricity from nuclear development activities to other sectors when sanctions increase.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Are Sanctions on North Korea Working?
Global Asia
2021 .09
-
Growth despite Sanctions? Revisiting the Effect of North Korea Sanctions
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2017 .09
-
North Korea’s Trade Policy Changes and Adaptation to Sanctions
무역연구
2024 .02
-
국제사회와 독자제재에 따른 경제적 영향 분석
무역학회지
2020 .08
-
A Study on North Korea’s International Trade Policy in the Middle of International Sanctions
무역연구
2019 .01
-
China’s Sanctions on North Korea After Its Fourth Nuclear Test
Pacific Focus
2017 .01
-
The Conditions for Sanctions Success: A Comparison of the Iranian and North Korean Cases
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2016 .01
-
유엔의 스마트제재 연구 : 앙골라 사례가 대북제재에 주는 시사점
국가전략
2015 .01
-
Coexistence of North Korea’s Nuclear Development and Economic Sanctions: The Dilemma of Policy Value Difference
Journal of Peace and Unification
2019 .01
-
North Korea’s Trade with China in 2019
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2020 .05
-
Effects of Economic Sanctions on North Korea–China Trade: A Dynamic Panel Analysis
Seoul Journal of Economics
2016 .01
-
Economic Sanctions and Leader Survival, 1945-2006
JIAS
2019 .01
-
대북제재의 게임이론적 접근과 북한경제에 미치는 영향
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2021 .12
-
핵무기 보유 추진 국가들과 경제제재 : 미국의 사례를 중심으로
한국정치학회보
2018 .09
-
Finding Loopholes in Sanctions: Effects of Sanctions on North Korea’s Refined Oil Prices
[KDI] Journal of Economic Policy
2020 .11
-
A Study on the Correlation Between Sanctions and Humanitarian Situation: Did Sanctions Lead to the Crisis in North Korea?
Pacific Focus
2024 .04
-
The Effect of Economic Sanction against North Korea on North Korea-China Trade
국제지역연구
2016 .01
-
Decision to End Economic Sanctions: Trade Sanction Types and Sender’s Withdrawal
분쟁해결연구
2024 .04
-
Assessing Export Controls of Strategic Items to North Korea
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .01
-
Current State and Assessment of the North Korean Economy and its Economic Cooperation with China under UN Sanctions: After Pyongyang's Fourth Nuclear Test
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0