지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Syrian crisis, which has been often described as a proxy war between NATO and Russia, has lasted for more than 10 years with no visible sign of an end. Most scholars explain the reasons behind NATO’s and Russian intervention with realistic motives. However, there are cases difficult to explain only from a realist perspective. For example, great power diplomatic efforts to remove chemical weapons and adopt sanctions at the cost of energy interests. These actions can be viewed as humanitarian involvement. The study argues that great powers’ motivation cannot be judged uniformly, but their actions should be evaluated separately, as some actions might be realist and some humanitarian, and some a mixture of both. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to examine the reasons behind great powers’ involvement in the Syrian crisis by examining key decisions each power took during the war, from both aspects: realist and humanitarian. The study begins by outlining the theoretical background behind both perspectives and establishing criteria for judging a decision as realist/ humanitarian. This has been applied in reviewing the context behind five key decisions NATO (the US and European allies) and Russia made during the crisis. The study finds that one time all parties acted in a realist fashion, which produced no significant outcome. Contrary to this, one time all parties acted on humanitarian motives, which resulted in a favorable outcome. In the case when two parties, the US and Russia, acted as a realist, and the EU as humanitarian power, the EU’s efforts were insufficient to produce a favorable outcome. In other cases, when two parties, the EU and the US, pursued humanitarian motives, and Russia realist, the result depended on whether Russia pursued them actively or non-actively. In the former case, the result was ineffective to prevent further atrocities, whereas in the latter favorable outcome was still possible.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Theoretical Framework
Ⅲ. NATO’s Interests and Relations with Syria
Ⅳ. Russian Interests and Relations with Syria
Ⅴ. Analysis of great powers’ involvement from realist and humanitarian perspectives
Ⅵ. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
NATO’s and Russian involvement in the Libyan Crisis in a view of the Post-Cold War Realism vs. Humanitarianism
세계지역연구논총
2023 .03
-
The United Nations Humanitarian Interventions: Selected Humanitarian Crisis in 1989-2014: Why Do Some Humanitarian Crisis Cases Not Experience UN Humanitarian Intervention?
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2020 .01
-
Justification and Limits of Applying ‘Responsibility to Protect’ on the Syrian Crisis
대한정치학회보
2024 .02
-
China’s Humanitarian Aid and Efforts to Engage in International Humanitarian Assistance
Journal of Global and Area Studies
2021 .01
-
A Study on the Correlation Between Sanctions and Humanitarian Situation: Did Sanctions Lead to the Crisis in North Korea?
Pacific Focus
2024 .04
-
Can Military Become an Accountable Humanitarian Actor?: Perception of Humanitarian Norms and Modus Operandi of the ROK Army and Japan Self Defense Force
국제개발협력연구
2024 .03
-
대북 제재가 인도주의 활동에 미치는 영향
문화와 정치
2021 .03
-
‘인도적 지원’(humanitarian assistance)에 있어서의 국제입법 동향 및 주요 쟁점
국제법평론
2015 .01
-
Reasons and Effects of EU Engagement in the Syrian Crisis
평화학연구
2017 .06
-
근거이론에 기초한 인도주의 리더십 실천 경험에 대한 다면적 영향요인 분석
교육혁신연구
2021 .09
-
유럽연합의 보호책임원칙 논의와 인도적 지원 매커니즘: 미얀마 사례를 중심으로
유럽연구
2021 .08
-
튀르키예의 NATO 내부 분열적 행동 연구 : 현실주의적 제도주의 시각
국제정치연구
2024 .06
-
Russia and the Korean Crisis Considered in 2018
World Environment and Island Studies
2018 .06
-
EU security: focus on the relationship with NATO
EU연구
2019 .01
-
국제인도법의 이행 확보 메커니즘
국제법평론
2021 .10
-
The EU’s Policy towards North Korea: Experiment of Engagement and Supporting Humanitarian Security
평화학연구
2016 .06
-
프랑스의 NATO 복귀 이후 유럽안보질서: 변화와 쟁점
유럽연구
2019 .11
-
6·25전쟁이 NATO의 확대에 미친 영향 - 그리스와 터키를 중심으로 -
군사
2023 .09
-
Great Power Relations and East Asia: A Realist Perspective
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-088095250