메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
배선혜 (건축공간연구원) 이여경 (건축공간연구원) 김민지 (건축공간연구원)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회논문집 大韓建築學會論文集 第39卷 第9號(通卷 第419號)
발행연도
2023.9
수록면
15 - 24 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
While the issuance of permits and reports for temporary buildings has been steadily rising in recent years, complaints linked to them persist due to the absence of well-defined legal benchmarks. To address these issues, this study scrutinizes civil grievances directed at the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, along with inquiries from officials and suggestions originating from local government representatives. By examining these inputs, the analysis pinpoints shortcomings within the system’s operation and proposes improvements. Through an exploration of both civil complaints and official perspectives, this study delineates three critical dimensions of concern: definition and scope, retention period, and the management of unauthorized temporary buildings. First, ambiguity envelops the definition of temporary buildings, leading to numerous disputes concerning the interpretation of pertinent laws and regulations. Second, a vast majority of temporary buildings can essentially be employed indefinitely through successive extension requests within the stipulated validity period, thus effectively enabling permanent utilization. Lastly, constraints are evident in the oversight of unauthorized temporary constructions. Although issues arise regarding structures lacking proper permissions for those exceeding their permissible duration, actively managing these illegal structures proves challenging due to the manpower constraints faced by local governments. To mitigate these institutional limitations, specific enhancements are recommended for each concern. The first entails clarifying principles and standards for categorizing temporary buildings within the Building Act. Next, establishing retention periods for temporary buildings should be guided by the features of facility type. Finally, continued efforts in institutional responses are essential. This involves bolstering punitive regulations for unauthorized temporary structures, fortifying administrative systems for efficient management, and sustaining comprehensive guidance and education on relevant procedures in tandem with systemic reforms.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 가설건축물 관련 법제도 현황
3. 가설건축물 제도 운영 실태
4. 가설건축물 제도 개선방안
5. 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0