지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.10
- 수록면
- 1 - 302 (302page)
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As we enter the Biden era, the conflict between the U.S. and China over the supply chain is becoming more acute. Immediately after taking office, Biden conducted a supply chain survey on four major U.S. fields (semiconductor, secondary battery, rare earth, and bio), and stressed that he would push for a supply chain strengthening strategy for secondary batteries used in electric vehicles (EVs) and ESSs since last year. In addition, in August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was announced, clarifying its intention to exclude China from the global electric vehicle supply chain.
China is ahead of the U.S. in secondary battery manufacturing. It has an overwhelming competitive advantage in all areas, including core minerals, materials, and cell manufacturing. And it has the world’s largest electric vehicle market. The U.S., which is in a defensive position, is trying to take the lead in the secondary battery industry by leveraging the large demand market. In response, China is expanding its industrial ecosystem to Europe and Southeast Asian markets outside of the U.S. and actively promoting its internalization strategy to maintain its competitive advantage while continuing to invest in core minerals and strengthening R&D on next-generation batteries.
As a result, the global supply chain of the secondary battery industry is highly likely to evolve into a U.S.-led electric vehicle ecosystem block and a China-led block. And most of all, Korea’s secondary battery industry is fiercely competing with China in the global market. As a result, our secondary battery industry is facing both crisis and opportunity in the upheaval of global supply chains being blocked.
Therefore, this study aims to examine the development of global supply chain blockization led by the U.S. and China’s supply chain strategy, focusing on secondary batteries, and to derive our countermeasures. To this end, we looked at the aspects of global supply chain blockization and the competitive advantage of the supply chain in China’s secondary battery industry. In addition, we analyzed China’s response strategy to supply chain block by scenario and analyzed its impact on our industry. Finally, we derived our countermeasures according to China’s response scenario and policy tasks for each scenario.
China is ahead of the U.S. in secondary battery manufacturing. It has an overwhelming competitive advantage in all areas, including core minerals, materials, and cell manufacturing. And it has the world’s largest electric vehicle market. The U.S., which is in a defensive position, is trying to take the lead in the secondary battery industry by leveraging the large demand market. In response, China is expanding its industrial ecosystem to Europe and Southeast Asian markets outside of the U.S. and actively promoting its internalization strategy to maintain its competitive advantage while continuing to invest in core minerals and strengthening R&D on next-generation batteries.
As a result, the global supply chain of the secondary battery industry is highly likely to evolve into a U.S.-led electric vehicle ecosystem block and a China-led block. And most of all, Korea’s secondary battery industry is fiercely competing with China in the global market. As a result, our secondary battery industry is facing both crisis and opportunity in the upheaval of global supply chains being blocked.
Therefore, this study aims to examine the development of global supply chain blockization led by the U.S. and China’s supply chain strategy, focusing on secondary batteries, and to derive our countermeasures. To this end, we looked at the aspects of global supply chain blockization and the competitive advantage of the supply chain in China’s secondary battery industry. In addition, we analyzed China’s response strategy to supply chain block by scenario and analyzed its impact on our industry. Finally, we derived our countermeasures according to China’s response scenario and policy tasks for each scenario.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[요약]
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 배경 및 필요성
2. 연구 목적 및 주요 연구 내용
[제2장 이차전지산업의 글로벌 공급망 블록화]
1. 이차전지산업의 글로벌 공급망 현황
2. 미국의 공급망 강화 전략
3. 글로벌 공급망 블록화 전개 양상과 특징
[제3장 중국 이차전지산업의 공급망 현황과 주요 특징]
1. 중국 이차전지산업의 발전 현황
2. 중국 이차전지산업의 주요 정책
3. 중국 이차전지산업의 글로벌 공급망 구조: 네트워크 분석
4. 중국 이차전지산업의 기술혁신 동향: 차세대 전지 특허 분석
[제4장 중국 이차전지산업의 공급망 전략과 우리 산업에 미치는 영향]
1. 중국의 공급망 전략의 주요 특징과 전망
2. 한ㆍ미ㆍ중 공급망 경쟁우위 분석
3. 중국의 대응 시나리오 및 공급망 구조 변화 분석
4. 중국의 대응 시나리오별 우리 산업의 영향
[제5장 우리의 대응 전략]
1. 이차전지산업의 글로벌 공급망 블록화 전망
2. 정책 대응 수요 및 기본 대응 방향
3. 시나리오별 정책과제
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2023-332-002023960