지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.7
- 수록면
- 202 - 206 (5page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
“The Gray Books” were internally published by the Chinese Communist Party, with limited access to the general public. In the early 1960s, China translated and published various theoretical works by Western socialists in order to criticise the “international revisionists”, mainly the Soviet Union, and to secure the primacy of the Chinese socialist system. However, these banned books were transmitted to the Cultural Revolution generation through various channels and provided an intellectual opportunity for fundamental reflection on the existing communist reality and ideology. In particular, the demand for “the Gray Books” surged during the disbanding of the Red Guards and the emergence of intellectual youth and various forms of underground reading movements centred on them.
As a result, regardless of their original purpose, “the Gray Books” do not have the effect of indoctrination, but rather stimulate intellectual enlightenment, triggering scepticism, reflection, and criticism rather than blind acceptance of the system. A typical example is Milovan Djilas’s The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System. The book was written to criticise the communist system and was therefore popular with “the rights” and “the apathy mass”(逍遙派) who were disappointed with the revolution. On the other hand, the book was also likely to be positively accepted as a reference book by the Moonhyeok school, which identified the Authoritarianism on the road to capitalism(走資派)=privileged bureaucracy=new class(新階級). This was because the “new class theory”(新階級論) was also a discourse that guaranteed the legitimacy of the Cultural Revolution, which set out to prevent the resurgence of the privileged class. Thus, the prevalence of “the Gray Books” reveals the paradox behind the reality of the Cultural Revolution symbolised by “burning books and burying scholars”(焚書坑儒).
As a result, regardless of their original purpose, “the Gray Books” do not have the effect of indoctrination, but rather stimulate intellectual enlightenment, triggering scepticism, reflection, and criticism rather than blind acceptance of the system. A typical example is Milovan Djilas’s The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System. The book was written to criticise the communist system and was therefore popular with “the rights” and “the apathy mass”(逍遙派) who were disappointed with the revolution. On the other hand, the book was also likely to be positively accepted as a reference book by the Moonhyeok school, which identified the Authoritarianism on the road to capitalism(走資派)=privileged bureaucracy=new class(新階級). This was because the “new class theory”(新階級論) was also a discourse that guaranteed the legitimacy of the Cultural Revolution, which set out to prevent the resurgence of the privileged class. Thus, the prevalence of “the Gray Books” reveals the paradox behind the reality of the Cultural Revolution symbolised by “burning books and burying scholars”(焚書坑儒).
목차
序論
1. 「灰皮書」の登場と流通
2. ‘灰皮書’の受容とその影響⎯新階級：対共産主義制度的分析-を中心に-
結論
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2023-910-001940620