지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.4
- 수록면
- 95 - 115 (21page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose - Green trade aligns with the ideology of environmental protection and sustainable economic development, and has become an important maker in determining national competitiveness, whereas green technology is a key driver of the development of green trade. This study examined the relationship between the determinants of green technology diffusion and green trade. Previous studies and theoretical foundations suggest that economic, technological, and institutional factors influence the diffusion of green technology among countries. For this study, trade openness, intellectual property protection, the level of development of information and communication technology (ICT), research and development (R&D) investment, environmental regulations, and environmental norms were derived and used as the independent variables. A comparative analysis of OECD and non-OECD countries was also conducted.
Design/Methodology - Panel data were collected from 61 countries for the period 2007–2017. The relationship between green technology diffusion and green trade was empirically analyzed using a random fixed effects model, with the demand for green technology expected to vary among countries because of their different economic development levels and goals. A comparative analysis was conducted based on the classification of countries by the level of economic development.
Findings - We found that the level of intellectual property protection and environmental norms have a positive impact on green technology diffusion. The results of a comparative analysis between OECD and non-OECD countries according to their economic development level showed that R&D investments and environmental norms have a positive impact on the diffusion of green technologies. Furthermore, the impact of green technology diffusion is greater in non-OECD than in OECD countries. In addition, green technology diffusion promotes the progress of green technology and positively affects green trade.
Originality/value - Previous studies have focused on technology transfer and green technology innovation at the firm level; however, research on green technology diffusion is insufficient. This study explored the determinants of green technology diffusion at the national level and linked them to green trade, thereby filling a gap in the literature on green technology diffusion and providing a reference for future studies.
Design/Methodology - Panel data were collected from 61 countries for the period 2007–2017. The relationship between green technology diffusion and green trade was empirically analyzed using a random fixed effects model, with the demand for green technology expected to vary among countries because of their different economic development levels and goals. A comparative analysis was conducted based on the classification of countries by the level of economic development.
Findings - We found that the level of intellectual property protection and environmental norms have a positive impact on green technology diffusion. The results of a comparative analysis between OECD and non-OECD countries according to their economic development level showed that R&D investments and environmental norms have a positive impact on the diffusion of green technologies. Furthermore, the impact of green technology diffusion is greater in non-OECD than in OECD countries. In addition, green technology diffusion promotes the progress of green technology and positively affects green trade.
Originality/value - Previous studies have focused on technology transfer and green technology innovation at the firm level; however, research on green technology diffusion is insufficient. This study explored the determinants of green technology diffusion at the national level and linked them to green trade, thereby filling a gap in the literature on green technology diffusion and providing a reference for future studies.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Research Model and Hypotheses
4. Empirical Analysis
5. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
In Search of Demanded Green Marketing Practices to Encourage Customer’s Eco-friendly Purchasing Intention
East Asian Journal of Business Economics
2022 .09
-
Drivers of green product adoption: the role of green perceived value, green trust and perceived quality
Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구)
2015 .01
-
A Study on the Performance Impact of Garment Manufacturing Firms Based on Green Supply Chains
무역연구
2019 .01
-
A Study on Green Consumer Segmentation Based on Socio-Demographics and Behavioral Responses : Renewing the Relationships between Socio-demographics and Green Behavior
ASIA MARKETING JOURNAL
2015 .04
-
Korea’s Green ODA: Performance and Challenges
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2022 .06
-
A Study on Factors Promoting Green Consumption through Decision Tree Analysis
유통경영학회지
2024 .04
-
Empowering Sustainable Development Goals through Green HRM: Driving Green Dynamic Capabilities and Green Innovation in Chinese Enterprises
Journal of China Studies
2024 .09
-
녹색금융정책의 성격과 한중일의 비교
무역연구
2015 .01
-
Green bonds: a survey
선물연구
2020 .01
-
항공사 고객의 친환경 그린 브랜드 자산에 대한 통합적 접근
관광연구저널
2017 .01
-
China’s Green Finance Strategy: A Key to Achieve Carbon Neutrality
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2023 .02
-
경기도 에너지전환을 위한 녹색금융 활성화 방안 연구
정책연구
2021 .06
-
항공사 승객의 지각된 그린 가치, 그린 이미지, 기업의 그린 평판과 그린 만족도 및 충성도와의 관계 연구
관광연구저널
2022 .06
-
제3차 경기도 녹색성장 추진계획 수립 연구
정책연구
2020 .04
-
A Tale of Two Greens : European Green Urbanism and Korea`s Green Growth Policies
한국공공관리학보
2015 .09
-
Green Growth and Solar Photovoltaic Technologies in Korea
Korea and the World Economy
2017 .02
-
그린 워싱에 대한 환경정보 제공이 시민의 친환경 상품에 대한 신뢰성과 구매 의사에 미치는 영향
환경교육
2017 .12
-
경기도 공동주택단지 녹지관리 현황과 정책방향
정책연구
2022 .10
-
A Study on Korea’s Green Logistics Activation Policy in the Age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution
무역학회지
2021 .06
-
민간부문 녹색구매 활성화 방안
정책연구
2022 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-324-001439428