메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김준연 (고려대학교)
저널정보
고려대학교 중국학연구소 중국학논총 중국학논총 제76호
발행연도
2022.6
수록면
309 - 342 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this study, the problem-based learning(PBL) instructional model of Chinese classical poetry was reviewed. PBL is a teaching and learning method designed so that students no longer focus on finding answers. Therefore, it emphasizes the process of solving unstructured problems that reflect the realistic context. The "ubiquity of knowledge" is the most changed educational environment in the era of digital transformation. The transfer of fixed knowledge can no longer be seen as a mastery of university education. Along with the change in the educational paradigm, the instructor's mission is now moving toward cultivating the ability of learners to construct knowledge on their own. However, as with all methodologies, theory alone does not solve all practical problems. It is necessary to improve the practical educational effect by examining all three elements of the class: instructor, learner, and educational content. The educational goal of "Chinese Classical Poetry 1" was placed on the general point of view of literary education such as cultivation of creativity, imagination, and expression. In order to find out which class model would be good when applying PBL, I meta-analyzed my own class site over three semesters. Four types of unstructured 'problems' to be presented to learners were selected: presentation of appreciation of the work, writing a book report, group discussion, and group performance. And we looked at the learner's results for this type. Overall, it is evaluated that the PBL instructional model has led to significant development in terms of motivation and achievement improvement in learning "Chinese Classical Poetry 1". The instructor's subjective impression of the effect of the instructional model is not enough. Therefore, a questionnaire consisting of 18 questions was distributed to 99 students and the results were analyzed. The learner's satisfaction with the PBL questionnaire model was generally excellent, so the possibility of this model could be highly evaluated. The "professionality," "difficulty level," and "group composition," which had somewhat low scores, were reviewed how to supplement the problems. Through the analysis of the results of the 4 multiple choice, it was possible to confirm the preference for group performance and group discussion. However, I still think the importance of personal learning should not be overlooked. In the analysis of the results of the descriptive question, the factors that students had difficulty or needed more support in the PBL class model were identified. Students asked for more attention to "time arrangement," "difficulty adjustment," and "providing examples and feedback." In addition, it was found that 'preparing objective evaluation standards' is also important. Referring to the analysis results as described above, it is expected that a better PBL class model can be designed. In short, I think PBL can be an attempt to establish the status of literary education more actively. What abilities should the 'human resources with humanities' that our era needs along with the right personality? Through the development of a teaching model using PBL, I hope that the class of Chinese classical poetry will be an example of how education performs such humanities' responsibilities.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0