지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.104 No.4
- 발행연도
- 2023.4
- 수록면
- 214 - 221 (8page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Although its efficacy is uncertain, an intraoperative air leak test (ALT) is commonly used to detect mechanical defects following bowel anastomosis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ALT to detect anastomotic leakage (AL) following rectal excision.
Methods: We reviewed our database for patients with rectal cancers who had undergone curative surgery between January 2012 and January 2018. Patients were grouped according to whether or not an ALT was performed. Propensity score analyses were performed to compare outcomes for groups in a 1:1 case-matched cohort.
Results: In total, 1,191 patients underwent rectal excision; 438 (219 in each group) formed the case-matched cohort for analysis. The protective stoma rate was 16.0% and 14.6% in the ALT and the no-ALT groups, respectively (P = 0.791). In the ALT group, 2 patients (0.9%) showed a positive result and were treated with rectal tube drainage, resulting in no leakage. There was no significant difference in postoperative AL rate between the groups (ALT group: 4.6% vs. no-ALT group: 4.1%, P > 0.999).
Conclusion: ALT played a minimal role in detecting AL following rectal excision. Further studies are warranted to validate our results and clarify whether AL can be prevented with ALT or alternative methods.
Methods: We reviewed our database for patients with rectal cancers who had undergone curative surgery between January 2012 and January 2018. Patients were grouped according to whether or not an ALT was performed. Propensity score analyses were performed to compare outcomes for groups in a 1:1 case-matched cohort.
Results: In total, 1,191 patients underwent rectal excision; 438 (219 in each group) formed the case-matched cohort for analysis. The protective stoma rate was 16.0% and 14.6% in the ALT and the no-ALT groups, respectively (P = 0.791). In the ALT group, 2 patients (0.9%) showed a positive result and were treated with rectal tube drainage, resulting in no leakage. There was no significant difference in postoperative AL rate between the groups (ALT group: 4.6% vs. no-ALT group: 4.1%, P > 0.999).
Conclusion: ALT played a minimal role in detecting AL following rectal excision. Further studies are warranted to validate our results and clarify whether AL can be prevented with ALT or alternative methods.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Can the Heald anal stent help to reduce anastomotic or rectal stump leak in elective and emergency colorectal surgery? A single-center experience
Annals of Coloproctology
2024 .02
-
Treatment of recurrence after local excision of rectal cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Emerging Trends in the Technology and Prevention of Rectal Anastomotic Leakage
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2018 .02
-
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy determines the prognostic impact of anastomotic leakage in advanced rectal cancer
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2022 .10
-
Tailored treatment of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery according to the presence of a diverting stoma
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2020 .09
-
Effect of reinforcement suture on anastomotic healing in rectal and sigmoid tumor resections, single-center experience: a retrospective case-controlled study
Annals of Coloproctology
2023 .04
-
Local Recurrence after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy And Rectal Excision in Rectal Cancer Patients When The Distal Resection Margin Is Compromised
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Comparison of Early and Late Anastomotic Leakage after Low Anterior Resection in Rectal Cancer Patients
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Single‑port versus multiport robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experiences by case‑matched analysis of short‑term outcomes
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2023 .08
-
Outcomes of Transanal Local Excision Methods in Patients with Rectal Neoplasm
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
The usefulness of transanal tube for reducing anastomotic leak in mid rectal cancer: compared to diverting stoma
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2021 .02
-
Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2016 .02
-
Optimal anastomotic technique in rectal surgery to prevent anastomotic leakage
Annals of Coloproctology
2023 .04
-
Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer : systematic review and meta-analysis
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2015 .09
-
Correlation between tumor regression grade and rectal volume in neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
Radiation oncology journal : ROJ
2016 .01
-
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by local excision in clinical T2N0 rectal cancer
Radiation oncology journal : ROJ
2016 .01
-
Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Update in 2015
Cancer Research and Treatment
2016 .01
-
Experience of sexual life in men with rectal cancer
성인간호학회 학술대회
2016 .06
-
Cross-sectional area of psoas muscle as a predictive marker of anastomotic failure in male rectal cancer patients: Japanese single institutional retrospective observational study
Annals of Coloproctology
2022 .10
-
Robotic Rectal Surgery - Do we Still Need More Evidence in the Real World?
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2015 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-514-001320708