지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to explain the role and nature of ‘X’ in X+katta. To achieve this, I compare the argument structure and meaning of katta with those of X+katta. Also, this paper tries to examine the synchronic status of X+katta. To achieve this, I investigate the stage of word’s category change. The followings are the discussions in this paper. First, the basic meaning of katta is ‘[comparison] ? [same]’ which is premised on the ‘act of comparison’. I postulate semantic change such as ‘[comparison] ? [same]’ into ‘[comparison] ? [similar]’, ‘[comparison] ? [similar]’ into ‘[figurative]’. Second, I divide X+katta into N+katta and ADV+katta. [figurative] of N+katta is originated in ① comparison attribute NP3 in argument of katta, ② comparison attribute NP3 which has abstract meaning in argument of katta, ③ comparison attribute NP2 which has figurative meaning in argument of katta. Meanwhile ADV of ADV+katta has <emphasis> meaning. Finally, I explain that the stage of category change of X+katta is ‘phrase construction’ -> …gwa eclipsis form’ -> ‘collocation construction’ -> ① ‘collocation construction’, ② ‘collocation construction’ which gains [figurative] meaning. Furthermore I confirm affixation of katta. I wish that this discussion is important because of specification about the argument structure and meaning of compound verbs such as X+katta.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0