개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The competitive landscape in the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) sector has changed dramatically for the past decades. New technologies and upgraded networks have given rise to new entrant competing in traditional markets with new business models and enabled the introduction of a wide array of new services and applications. As a result, competition from these new entrants, business models, and services are compelling the incumbent market players to adapt quickly.
These changes have also brought a challenge to competition law enforcers and policymakers. A range of issues must be addressed to make sure that competition can continue to thrive in the ICT sector. The dynamic nature of the ICT industry poses several challenges to find out whether and/or what types of regulations are necessary in order to protect and promote competition. Such challenges have appeared through the issues related to inter-platform competition, horizontal and vertical integrations, and a new business model competition.
This paper will attempt to find implications for the Korean competition law enforcement in the ICT sector by examining competitive issues arising from some recent cases across the world. In this paper, Google/Double-Click merger case, Abusive conduct of Google in the mobile platform market, and Google Books Project case are to be discussed. These cases are believed to be the cases that have recently called the most robust attention from global competition law enforcers, practicing lawyers and academics. In our view, those three cases are worth being explored as references for regulatory adaptations to the fast evolving ICT sector competition.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0