메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
서리빈 (맨체스터 혁신정책연구소) 윤현덕 (숭실대학교)
저널정보
한국중소기업학회 기업가정신과 벤처연구(JSBI)(구 벤처경영연구) 기업가정신과 벤처연구 제17권 제4호
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
67 - 95 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
To achieve high performance standards depends on effectively measuring and monitoring company’s performance by reflecting continuously whether a firm reacts and adapts to external changes. A growing number of empirical works support key assertions of the resource-based view (RBV) literature that a firm’s competitive advantage and performance originated from its unique firm-specific resources and inimitable capabilities. Most based on the literature have examined the immediate impact of resources which a firm possesses on performance, and many of them have emphasized on quantitative indicators to measure innovation performance. However, high-tech small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) suffering from lack of resources and managerial expertise usually requires a longer lead time from obtaining resources to achieving anticipated outcomes than expected due to high complexity and uncertainty of their research and development (R&D). During the lead time, the SMEs with insufficient ability to keep evaluating current performance measurement continuously can face a challenge to identify directions for innovation in coping with external changes. In line with RBV, this study aims to develop a performance evaluation framework of innovation process that enables high-tech SMEs to identify the main weaknesses and take corrective measures during R&D periods. Starting from a review of the limitations and recommendations provided in the literature regarding technology and innovation management in SMEs, we propose that technological competitiveness (TC) may be a more accurate, key performance indicator of high-tech SMEs than widely accepted indicator, such as innovative product rates, patent numbers, and R&D spending. The concept of TC was developed on the basis of Korean Technology Guarantee Fund’s technology rating system that measures technological superiority, marketability and feasibility of a developing technology. In the samples of 360 Korean high-tech SMEs with the Venture Business Certificate issued by Korean Small and Medium Business Administration, the integrated research model structured with innovation capabilities (ICs), entrepreneurial orientation (EO), TC, and business performance was tested through multi-regression model. The results confirms that TC affected positively by ICs and EO should be considered a significant innovation process output that reinforces business performance of high-tech SMEs. Both of ICs-R&D, manufacturing, marketing strategic planning, organizational management, learning, and resource allocation capability- and EO-innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking-have more positively effect on TC than business performance. Lastly, TC fully mediates the weaker relationships of ICs and EO with business performance. This framework of high-tech SMEs, the ICs/EO-TC-business performance relationship, contributes to forming the input-output-outcome mechanism of their innovation process as well as deeper understanding of the value of adapting TC into a performance evaluation measurement in the process of implementing technological innovation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (72)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0