메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최성경 (단국대학교)
저널정보
한국가족법학회 가족법연구 가족법연구 제26권 제1호
발행연도
2012.3
수록면
171 - 208 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It has been over half a century since the Separation of North and South Korea. There are people whose family members are not allowed to live together though the rest are accustomed to this circumstances. Fortunately, government and NGO are endeavoring to relieve the burden of separated families humanistically. So comes the increase of contacts between two people and uprising of legal issues. In cope with these, there have been assertions to prepare for the problems like the inheritance rights and family relations of North and South Koreans. Even, some of those issues were took into courts. Since the Civil Law was not meant to deal with special circumstance like the separation of Korea, there was need to make special Acts. The Ministry of Justice arranged 'The Inheritance Rights and Family Relations of North and South Koreans' and it was publicated on 10th of February, 2012, after getting assent from Assembly.This study was intended to introduce and review the special Acts.The Acts consist of 6 chapters and 23 articles and deal with jurisdiction, family relations, inheritance and management of property, though this study deals only with enacting process, the explanation of the articles and reviews. Principal reviews are on bigamy, the adjudication of disappearance, the suit of confirmation of existence of biological parental relation, the suit of claim for recognition, the return of inherited property, the claim for recovery of inheritance and qualified acceptance.The parts dealing with family relations and inheritance rights of North Koreans are generally persuasive and reasonable, although in its detail it needs amendments and it needs more coverage on legislation. So, this study suggests a few ideas on legislation.Firstly, it would be better if the sentences of the articles were not complicated.Secondly, special regulations on the extension of exclusion period of the claim for recovery of inheritance.And thirdly, it is better to keep the stance of not approving special law on extinctive prescription of rights to claim the return of the legal reserve of inheritance.In legislation, it could be the decision of legal policy, nevertheless legislation should be balanced between specific reasonability and legal stability. In other words, microcalibration of legislation to permit each North Koreans and related South Koreans better reasonability and also legally acceptable and at the same time, to give least impact on the stability of contracts.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0