메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
왕흠범 (연세대학교 국어국문학과)
저널정보
한국문법교육학회 문법교육 문법 교육 제43권
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
161 - 204 (44page)
DOI
10.21850/kge.2021.43..161

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present study aims to investigate linguistic variation patterns of coda plosives deletion in L2 Korean, for which academic presentation data of Chinese-L1 advanced learners were collected in order to identify the linguistic environment that promotes or inhibits coda plosives deletion. The linguistic environment can be divided into two categories: phonological environment and grammatical environment. The former one consists of ‘coda plosive type’, ‘following phoneme type’, and ‘preceding vowel type’, while the latter one includes ‘grammatical condition’ and ‘following morpheme type’. In accordance with the results of the variable rule analysis, the ‘learner’ factor group had the greatest influence on coda plosives deletion, followed by ‘coda plosive type’ and ‘following phoneme type’. In the meantime, ‘following morpheme type’ was found to be an independent variable with the weakest effect. Regarding the coda plosives deletion variability according to the phonological environment, firstly, the learner had the highest possibility of deleting [t┐] but could properly pronounce [p┐] in various linguistic environments. Second, coda plosives are most probably deleted if a nasal or a stop follows. It is proved that glottals and monophthongs or w-diphthongs are the favorable environment for learners to properly pronounce coda plosives, with the deletion being suppressed. Third, when the syllable nucleus is a low vowel, the probability of coda plosive deletion was highest, with the remaining factors (i.e. vowel types) suppressing the deletion. Regarding the coda plosives deletion variability based on the grammatical environment, first, ‘inside a phonological word’ and ‘outside a phonological word’ were proved to be deletion-promoting factors, while the deletion probability was the lowest if the coda plosive is placed inside a simple word. Second, among the ‘following morpheme type’ factor group, although there is only the ‘vocabulary morpheme’ factor proving deletion, what can be shown is that learners almost similarly deleted in all factors due to the lowest factor weight range among the six factor groups.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0