Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery versus Open Posterior Instrumentation Surgery for Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture

Hong Sung-Ha; Suh Seung-Pyo; Yeom Jiung; Kim Joo-Young; Lee Seung Gi; Han Jeong-Woon

doi:10.31616/asj.2020.0572

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Hong Sung-Ha (Department of Orthopedic Surgery Sung-Ae Hospital Seoul Korea) Suh Seung-Pyo (Department of Orthopedic Surgery Sung-Ae Hospital Seoul Korea) Yeom Jiung (Department of Orthopedic Surgery Sung-Ae Hospital Seoul Korea) Kim Joo-Young (Department of Orthopedic Surgery Sung-Ae Hospital Seoul Korea) Lee Seung Gi (Department of Orthopedic Surgery Sung-Ae Hospital Seoul Korea) Han Jeong-Woon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery Sung-Ae Hospital Seoul Korea)

저널정보: 대한척추외과학회 Asian Spine Journal Asian Spine Journal Vol.15 No.6

발행연도: 2021.12

수록면: 761 - 768 (8page)

DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0572

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Study Design: Retrospective study. Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiological results of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) and open posterior instrumenta tion surgery for the treatment of unstable burst fractures. Overview of Literature: MISS has exhibited postoperative outcomes similar to those obtained using open posterior instrumentation in various spine diseases. There remains no consensus regarding the use of MISS in the treatment of unstable burst fracture. Methods: We enrolled 40 patients who underwent either MISS (M group, 20 patients) or open posterior instrumentation surgery (O group, 20 patients) for the treatment of traumatic unstable burst fractures. Clinical outcomes were evaluated based on postoperative back pain, operation time, blood loss, hospital stay duration, and perioperative complications. For radiologic evaluation, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and plain radiography were performed before and after the surgery to evaluate the changes in the ky photic angle and fracture union. Results: The change in the kyphotic angle was ?8.2°±5.8° in the M group and ?8.0°±7.8° in the O group. No significant difference was noted in terms of the change in the kyphotic angle (p=0.94, t-test) after 12 months of surgery. The Visual Analog Scale score was 1.5±0.7 points in the M group, while it was 5.2±1.4 points in the O group. In the M group, back pain has significantly decreased (p<0.01, t-test). The estimated blood loss was 195.5 mL in the M group and 1,077.5 mL in the O group; the operation time was significantly decreased in the O group from 290.7 to 120.7 minutes in the M group (p<0.05, t-test) (p=0.36, t-test). The average duration of hospital stay was 36.0 days in the M group and 41.9 days in the O group (p=0.36, t-test). Conclusions: For the treatment of unstable burst fractures, MISS showed significant differences in terms of postoperative back pain, operation time, and blood loss as compared to open posterior instrumentation surgery.

#Spine #Spinal fractures #Minimally invasive surgical procedures #Instrumentation #Pedicle screws

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

Hu R / 1996 / Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete population / Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 21:492~499

Jansson KA / 2010 / Thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in Sweden : an analysis of 13, 496 patients admitted to hospital / Eur J Epidemiol 25:431~437

Khoo LT / 2002 / Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion / Neurosurgery 51(5 Suppl):S166~S181

Guiot BH / 2002 / A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine / Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 27:432~438

Foley KT / 2002 / Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine : preliminary clinical results / J Neurosurg 97(1 Suppl):7~12

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!