지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Ellipsis typically occurs in declarative sentences, but can also appear in questions including fragment questions (FQs) like What about Mimi? in English or Mimi-nun ‘Mimi-TOP?’ in Korean. These fragment questions also have some understood materials unexpressed, but induce a full sentential question meaning. This paper reviews some key properties of such FQs in Korean, and then discusses possible arguments for a move-and-delete sentential approach. After reviewing challenging issues for the sentential approach, the paper then offers a direct interpretation (DI) approach, which refers to no sentential sources but to discourse structure. It suggests that this DI approach is a more feasible direction for the analysis of FQs in Korean.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
Barton, Ellen / 1990 / Nonsentential constituents / John Benjamins
Büring, Daniel / 2003 / On D-trees, beans, and B-accents / Linguistics and Philosophy 26(1):511~545
Constant, Noah / 2014 / Contrastive topic : Meanings and realizations
Culicover, Peter W. / 2005 / Simpler syntax / Oxford University Press
Ginzburg, Jonathan / 2012 / The interactive stance : Meaning for conversation / Oxford University Press
Büring, Daniel / 2003 / On D-trees, beans, and B-accents / Linguistics and Philosophy 26(1):511~545
Constant, Noah / 2014 / Contrastive topic : Meanings and realizations
Culicover, Peter W. / 2005 / Simpler syntax / Oxford University Press
Ginzburg, Jonathan / 2012 / The interactive stance : Meaning for conversation / Oxford University Press
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean
언어연구
2017 .01
-
Fragments in Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
Negated Fragments: A Direct Interpretation Approach
영어학
2020 .03
-
Fragments of Self-Pronouns in English: A Direct Generation Analysis
영어학연구
2018 .01
-
관용표현이 조각문에 관해 말해주는 것
언어학 연구
2015 .10
-
Fragment answers in Korean: A direct interpretation approach
언어연구
2016 .01
-
A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
국어 조각구에 관한 분석
언어학 연구
2016 .04
-
Why-Stripping in English and Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach
생성문법연구
2017 .01
-
Notes on Fragments with Tag Questions in English and Korean
생성문법연구
2018 .01
-
Notes on Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments: A Reply to Chung (2019)
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
한국어 조각문의 형성 과정: (이동과) 생략
언어와 정보사회
2017 .07
-
Sentential Subjects Revisited
새한영어영문학
2015 .02
-
Some Notes on Ahn and Cho‘s (2017a, b, c) Approach to Fragment Answers in Korean
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
On Caseless Fragments and Some Implications
어학연구
2017 .08
-
Case and Postposition Stranding in Multiple Fragments : Why is the Final Fragment (not) Special?
어학연구
2015 .12
-
Asymmetry of Deletion within the Pied-Piping Fragment
언어와 정보
2019 .02
-
English if (not)-stripping Constructions: A Direct Interpretation Approach
영어학
2022 .01
-
Idiomatic Fragment Answers in Negation
영어영문학연구
2016 .01
-
Right Dislocation vs. Fragment: A Reply to Ko (2014)
생성문법연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0