The rate and stability of mandibular block bone graft in recent 5 years

Park Jong-Cheol; 김윤호; 최홍석; Jong-Shik Oh; Shin Sanghun; Kim Yong Deok

doi:DOI 10.1186/s40902-017-0118-0

The rate and stability of mandibular block bone graft in recent 5 years

Recommendations

Search

Type: Academic journal

Author: Park Jong-Cheol (부산대학교) 김윤호 (부산대학교) 최홍석 (부산대학교) Jong-Shik Oh (부산대학교) Shin Sanghun (부산대학교) Kim Yong Deok (부산대학교)

Journal: Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons Maxillofacial Plastic Reconstructive Surgery Maxillofacial Plastic Reconstructive Surgery 제39권 제7호 KCI Accredited Journals

Published: 2017.7

Pages: 1 - 6 (6page)

DOI: DOI 10.1186/s40902-017-0118-0

Usage

The rate and stability of mandibular block bone graft in recent 5 years

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors

Background: The purposes of the present study were to compare implant stabilities of mandibular block bonegraft and bovine bone graft and to evaluate influencing factors for implant stability in mandibular block bone(MBB) graft. Methods: This retrospective study investigated 1224 cases and 389 patients treated by one surgeon in theDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Pusan National University Dental Hospital (Yangsan, Korea) betweenJanuary 2010 and December 2014. Proportions that MBB graft cases constitute in all implant restoration cases andin all bone graft cases were measured. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were achieved by the same surgeonbefore loading. The average ISQ values of the experimental groups were compared. In addition, ISQ values ofinfluencing factors, such as age, sex, implant size, and implant placement site, were compared within the MBBgroup using OsstellTM Mentor (Osstell®, Goteborg, Sweden). Paired t test and ANOVA were conducted for statisticalanalysis with a significance level of 0.05. Results: Fifty-five percent of all implant restoration cases performed bone graft while MBB cases constituted 34% ofall implant restoration cases and 61% of all bone graft cases. Comparing ISQ values according to bone graftmaterials, the MBB group manifested sufficient implant stability by presenting comparable ISQ value to that of theexperimental group without bone graft. Among the reviewed factors, females, mandibular molar regions, andimplants in larger diameter displayed greater implant stabilities. Conclusions: Satisfactory implant stability was accomplished upon administration of MBB graft. Within the limitationof this study, gender, implant site, and implant diameter were speculated to influence on implant stability in MBB graft.

#Implant stability #Mandibular block bone #Bone graft #ISQ #Impact factor

No content found

References (27)

Add References

Keller E / 1987 / Prosthetic-surgical reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with iliac bone grafting and tissue-integrated prostheses / Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2:39~55

Donovan MG / 1994 / Maxillary and mandibular reconstruction using calvarial bone grafts and Branemark implants: a preliminary report / J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:588~594

Iturriaga MTMN / 2004 / Maxillary sinus reconstruction with calvarium bone grafts and endosseous implants / J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:344~347

Barone A / 2007 / Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: clinical results / J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:2039~2046

Pikos MA / 2005 / Mandibular block autografts for alveolar ridge augmentation / Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 13:91~107

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!