지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.3
- 수록면
- 57 - 94 (38page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Readers’ active use of linguistic cues from a given context elicits anticipatory processing of yet-to-be-encountered information. In this study, we aimed to examine whether the patterns of anticipatory comprehension would systematically differ by the degree of readers’ working memory capacity. Readers’ evoked responses potentials (ERPs) in response to words were recorded in the processing of Korean dative sentences (i.e., subject+[recipient+theme]/[theme-recipient]+adverb+verb) in which the presentation order of arguments (i.e., role predictability) and the likelihood corresponding to argument role fillers (i.e., word predictability) were manipulated. We found quantitative and qualitative differences in ERPs among readers during sentence comprehension. The N400 emerged in the integration of unpredictable words, and it occurred more frequently among readers with low working memory. Of our interest, we observed the asymmetrical distribution of the negativity and the positivity, attributable to the differences in readers’ working memory, at adverbs and verbs in which readers were busy with integrating previously-presented arguments into sentences and processing incoming words. Our results suggested that readers with low working memory are more involved in the lexical retrieval process, whereas those with high working memory are more attentive to the structural or semantic integration process. In short, we argued that the lack of working memory capacity could make readers fall behind in using lexical and structural information during sentence processing, particularly for argument integration.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0