메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
이지은 (경기연구원) 박충훈 (경기연구원) 가선영 (경기연구원)
저널정보
경기연구원 정책연구 [정책연구 2022-35] 「경기 푸른미래관」 입사 대상 확대 방안 연구
발행연도
2022.7
수록면
1 - 183 (183page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Poor housing condition of the young has become a social issue recently. A housing welfare policy has been therefore required for the public sector to provide residential space in order to solve the problem. Gyeonggi-do has suggested a policy on expanding the scope of eligible candidates for the ‘Gyeonggi Bright Future Hall’ residents which are currently limited to university students. However, the competition rate for the ‘Gyeonggi Bright Future Hall’ is already high. Expanding the scope of eligible candidates can entail a fairness issue for university students. Thus this study, first, analyzes the operation condition of the ‘Gyeonggi Bright Future Hall’ and identifies the necessity for securing space. Second, it estimates the future population and students, and examines whether the new policy will damage fairness. Lastly, it examines the current condition of the hall through a survey and collects opinions on the new policy on expanding the scope of the eligible candidates.

This study finds that the number of students in their 20s will decrease but the competition rate for residency in the ‘Gyeonggi Bright Future Hall’ will be still high. It estimates the number of current eligible candidates for the hall will decrease according to the decreasing number of university students. But it is anticipated that the size of the entrance to higher-ranking universities in the Seoul region will not decrease in proportion to the number of university students. In the future, those new students who go to universities in Seoul and Gyeonggi regions will be fewer than about 35% of those in 2017. Even in that case, the competition rate for the ‘Gyeonggi Bright Future Hall’ is expected to be higher than 5:1. Therefore, it is possible that the competition rate will rise even higher, if the scope of eligible candidates is expanded.

Despite the high demand for residency, the ‘Gyeonggi Bright Future Hall’ is not only outdated but also narrow to reside in, which necessitates improvements. Compared to other halls run by Gyeonggi-do, the ‘Gyeonggi Bright Future Hall’ is narrow and half the size of the ‘Songpa Hall’. Moreover, shared bathrooms in the ‘Gyeonggi Bright Future Hall’ are prone to contagious diseases and inappropriate for the Covid-19 situation.

This study proposes space expansion of the ‘Gyeonggi Bright Future Hall’ for the sake of better quality of life of the residents so that, for example, the residents can have single rooms and access to private bathrooms. The expansion seems necessary apart from the plan to expand the scope of eligible candidates.

This study further proposes ways to complement blind spots of housing welfare policies for the young. It is deemed improper to expand the scope of the eligible candidates due to different residence purposes and life patterns between students and non-student young people. Also, expanding the scope may deprive university students of the opportunity for residency, generating fairness problems. It is necessary to separate policies for students and non-student young people. In the long term, it is advisable to complement inadequate housing welfare policies for the young. It is necessary not to define the young as people between the age of 19 and 39, but to subdivide the young into different categories based on economic activity, level of income, region and the like. Moreover, this study suggests to lower the standard of income to expand beneficiaries of the housing welfare policy for the young, to manage and direct housing environment of the young, and to increase rent support for the young.

목차

[표지]
[정책건의]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법
[제2장 이론적 고찰 및 선행연구 검토]
1. 기숙사 개념 및 기능
2. 기숙사 관련 법·제도
3. 선행연구 검토
[제3장 기숙사 및 청년주거지원제도 현황 분석]
1. 자치단체 기숙사 운영 현황
2. 경기 푸른미래관
3. 우리나라 청년주거지원제도 현황
4. 시사점
[제4장 경기 푸른미래관 입사 대상 확대 방안 분석]
1. 인구 및 학령인구 추계분석
2. 경기 푸른미래관 공간확보 필요성 분석
3. 청년 입사 대상 확대 방안 분석
[제5장 결론]
1. 요약
2. 정책제안
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[부록]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-309-000445770