메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김민지 (문양연구재단)
저널정보
한국복식학회 복식 복식 제72권 제6호(통권 제241호)
발행연도
2022.12
수록면
139 - 155 (17page)
DOI
10.7233/jksc.2022.72.6.139

이용수

DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study examines the definitions of hanbok from the following dictionaries: Standard Korean Language Dictionary; Encyclopedia of Korean Culture; Encyclopedia of Korean Folk Culture; A Dictionary of Korean Traditional Apparel; Oxford English Dictionary; The Collins Dictionary; Urban Dictionary, and one from a webpage on Korean culture promotion by the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism of the Republic of Korea (ROK). The examination brings to light the problematic wordings and further discusses why they are problematic. Describing the attributes of hanbok as timeless and static, the definitions do not reflect the historical development of hanbok in dynamism. The discussion contends the following. First, hanbok is a collective noun that refers to the category of traditional clothing of Korea, not only a costume for men and women. Second, given that the term hanbok was coined at the turn of the 20th century, its concept and historical timeline are part of Korea’s modern fashion history, not that of pre-modern, from the ancient to Joseon (1392-1910). Third, the trajectory of hanbok shows its evolution in the contexts of being modernized, hybridized, and culturally authenticated, rather than remaining “traditional” and “authentic.” Fourth, hanbok has served as ethnic dress for ethnic Koreans across the globe and national dress of the ROK. Fifth, as the ROK increasingly becomes a multi-ethnic country in the 21st century, the word “uri (lit. our/we),” which is commonly used to describe the ethnic Korean community as a single entity, should be changed to a third-person perspective. Sixth, the elements of clothing that are subject to change, such as stylistic characteristics, occasions for wearing, and construction methods, must be inclusively described. The arguments presented here are anticipated to contribute to revision of the definitions of hanbok in dictionaries and conceptualization of hanbok as an academic keyword in dress/fashion studies.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 한복의 정의에 관한 기존의 논의
Ⅲ. 한복의 사전적 정의 검토
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-381-000309693