메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김미란 (성공회대학교)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 동북아 문화연구 제73집
발행연도
2022.12
수록면
173 - 193 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Chinese society, which has adopted the pursuit-type industrialization model, has been pursuing the “localization” of academic studies and discourse after the 2008 US financial crisis and the hosting of the Beijing Olympics. This study examines how the discussion of masculinity in Chinese society develops under such a background of the times.
In China in 2010, the decline in academic ability and physical strength of male students was combined with “gender” and discussed as a “social problem,” gender conflicts in China have been intensifying in educational sites, sports, and state-run discourse. Furthermore, this has developed into a discourse on the national crisis that “when men become feminine, the state becomes feminine,” and disparaging of “femininity” is becoming explicit. However, in daily life, the new generation born in the 1980s and 90s tends to neutralize, with little resistance to “feminine” temperament and no clear boundaries of gender roles in home care. This study understands that this misogyny and Chinese society’s desire for strong masculinity is due to the external conflict that China experienced in the 21st century, that is, the sense of crisis caused by the Sino-US conflict, and considered the education community criticizing “niangpao 娘炮 (feminine man),” the national crisis discourse, and the “straight man” debate showing off masculinity. However, this discourse reveals a considerable gap with the gender perception of the new generation. Therefore, unlike the nationalist discourse that pursues strong masculinity, in reality, it can be said that the dominant and hegemonic masculinity as a governing tool is marginalizing or disappearing day by day.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. ‘강한 남성성’ 선망과 그 ‘불안’
Ⅲ. 교육계의 ‘꽃미남’ 혐오
Ⅳ. ‘민족위기’담론과 ‘중성화’하는 신세대
Ⅴ. ‘돌보는 아버지’의 부상과 ‘감정’에 대한 새로운 인식
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
논문초록

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-910-000320040