메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Seahwa Won (Kyonggi University)
저널정보
한국디자인학회 Archives of Design Research Archives of Design Research Vol.35 No.3 (Wn.143)
발행연도
2022.8
수록면
69 - 79 (11page)
DOI
10.15187/adr.2022.08.35.3.69

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: Previous studies have suggested that the use of tools in design improves the efficiency of the design process and the quality of the design outcomes. In light of these trends, a variety of color tools were introduced and developed for design experts. However, little attention has been paid to students’ perceptions and needs in relation to color tools. A lack of understanding of user needs for color tools could result in weak attempts to deliver useful data to users.
Methods: This study presents the results of an in-depth inquiry into students’ use of color tools in design work. A qualitative and exploratory study was conducted by means of 10 semi-structured interviews with first-year and senior students.
Results: The findings of this study included four themes: (a) students’ views on color in design, (b) students’ color-decision process, (c) students’ dissatisfactions and requirements with current color tools, and (d) types of useful color data considered by students. Students showed a consensus view on the significance of color in design to deliver target messages and to enhance their design stand out in the market. Most of the students’ color-decision processes included four stages: concept development, color data gathering, exploration, and color choice. However, two out of the 10 students reported different color-decision processes. The students delayed their color decision at the final design stage because they felt anxious and a lack of confidence about their color choice. With regard to satisfaction with the current color tools available, students reported that most tools needed improvement. Students identified three types of color data (color meaning, color trend, and color printing) as important in their design process. Preferred tool types and various ideas for color tools were also suggested.
Conclusions: There is a gap between what students need from color tools and what the existing color tools provide. The findings indicate that available color tools may not be suitable for educational purposes.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical background
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0