메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Against Neoclassical Poetic Practices in Mary Wollstonecraft's “On Poetry” and William Wordsworth's “Preface” to the Lyrical Ballads
Recommendations
Search
Questions

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Jihee Kim (Dongguk University)
Journal
The Korean Society Of East-West Comparative Literature The Journal of East-West Comparative Literature Vol.59 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2022.3
Pages
101 - 120 (20page)
DOI
10.29324/jewcl.2022.3.59.101

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Against Neoclassical Poetic Practices in Mary Wollstonecraft's “On Poetry” and William Wordsworth's “Preface” to the Lyrical Ballads
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
This essay offers a comparative investigation of Mary Wollstonecraft’s “On Poetry, and Our Relish for the Beauties of Nature” and William Wordsworth’s “Preface” to the Lyrical Ballads, to explore how their poetic principles are at odds with neoclassical poetic practices. Wordsworth’s Lyrical Ballads had a seminal influence on the development of Romanticism in Britain, and his criticism of neoclassical poetic practices in the “Preface” to the 1800 edition has been widely recognized by contemporary critics and modern scholars alike. However, he was not the only writer to criticize contemporary poetic practices. Wollstonecraft contributed an essay titled “On Poetry” to the Monthly Magazine in April 1797, in which she disapproves of contemporary poetic principles and argues for the importance of the poet’s own feelings as the main inspiration for poetry. By comparing these two contrasting views on poetry, this essay provides a new perspective on Wordsworth’s “Preface,” and at the same time investigates Wollstonecraft’s lesser-known view of poetry. It argues that both Wollstonecraft and Wordsworth highlighted the power of genuine feeling and imagination in poetry and repudiated neoclassical poetic practices, though the central points of their criticisms differ. While Wollstonecraft focused on the borrowing of images from ancient literature, Wordsworth paid greater attention to language, particularly neoclassical poetic diction. This essay begins by exploring these two main features of conventional poetic practices, which they object to in their texts. It then explores Wollstonecraft’s and Wordsworth’s views on poetry by examining their criticisms of neoclassical poetic conventions.

Contents

ABSTRACT
I. Introduction
II. Neoclassical Imitation and Poetic Diction
III. Mary Wollstonecraft’s Criticism of the Trend of Poetic Imitation in “On Poetry”
IV. The “real language of man” in William Wordsworth’s Indictment Against Poetic Diction in the “Preface” to the Lyrical Ballads
V. Conclusion
Works Cited

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-800-001613347