메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국토양비료학회 한국토양비료학회지 한국토양비료학회지 제55권 제2호
발행연도
2022.5
수록면
121 - 128 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study was conducted to suggest a method to assess soil suitability for crops objectively with categorical soil data and multivariate analysis methods. The Quantification Theory I was selected for the multivariate analysis method and the comprehensive point method was used as the conventional analysis tool for soil suitability assessment. The sites to survey soil characteristics and fig production were determined to include all classes of soil samples for all soil factors. Soil factors were soil texture of the subsoil, drainage class, available soil depth, gravel contents, and soil slope. In order to apply it nationwide based on the materials of the survey area, we used the 1,361 soil symbols data in Korea. After calculating the quantity forecast value for each soil factors, it was divided into four equal parts in descending order of very suitable, suitable, possible, and not suitable area. In the comprehensive point method, points were applied for each soil factor, and then classified according to the sum of the scores. The result of comparing the soil suitability class of the two setting methods the 1,361 soil symbols, 876 (64.4%) had the same grade, and 485 (35.6%) were classified as one grade lower or higher. Quantification Theory I is considered to have the potential to be utilized because it has the advantage of being able to classify at once through statistical analysis without subjective intervention if there is crop quantity data.

목차

ABSTRACT
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
Conclusions
References

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0