메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Eunkyung Sung (Cyber Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.22
발행연도
2022.1
수록면
153 - 168 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of the present study was to examine how listeners’ native language affected the use of four different acoustic cues (duration, F0, intensity, and vowel quality) in identifying lexical stress in English. Native Korean and English listeners judged lexical stress placement in nonce words in which the first or the second syllable was varied systematically regarding the four acoustic cues. The results of proportions of trochaic responses and statistical analyses showed that all four cues were important predictors of the listeners’ stress perception. However, the two listener groups performed differently when considering response patterns for four acoustic cues separately. Specifically, the Korean listeners were significantly more sensitive to F0 and intensity cues than the English listeners. There were no statistically significant differences between the two listener groups in terms of duration and vowel quality cues. Also, there were significant effects of interaction between acoustic cues and listener groups for duration and F0 cues. The Korean listeners relied more on F0 and less on duration than the English listeners. These findings imply that L2 listeners’ perception of lexical stress is not entirely predicted by L1 prosody. Furthermore, for both groups of listeners the cue shift from iambic to noncontrastive stress patterns induced less changes in trochaic stress responses than that from noncontrastive to trochaic stress patterns. This preference for trochaic stress perception over iambic stress needs to be further investigated in the future study.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Perceptual Cues to English Lexical Stress
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion and Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0