지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.3
- 수록면
- 15 - 21 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background: This study was performed to identify the incidence of screw in-type lateral anchor pull-out in patients older than 60 years who underwent rotator cuff repair for large to massive rotator cuff tear (RCT).
Methods: We reviewed 25 patients over 60 who were diagnosed with large to massive RCT and underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in our hospital from March 2017 to February 2021. Preoperative tear size (anterior to posterior, medial to lateral) was measured via preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All 25 patients underwent MRI scanning on postoperative day 1 and at 3 months after surgery. The change of anchor position was measured in axial views on MRI images postoperative day 1 and 3 months after surgery. And it was statistically compared according to bone mineral density (BMD), sex, and number of lateral anchors.
Results: Two MRIs (postoperative day 1 and 3 months) in 25 patients were compared. Anchor pull-out occurred in six patients during 3 months (6.7%), and the mean pull-out length difference was 1.56 mm (range, 0.16–2.58 mm). There was no significant difference in the number of pull-out anchors, degree of pull-out difference by comparing BMD (A, BMD≤–2.5; B, BMD>–2.5), sex, or number of anchors used in each surgery (C, two anchors; D, three anchors) (p>0.05).
Conclusions: Pull-out of screw in-type anchors was rarely observed and the mean pull-out length difference was negligibly small in our study. The screw in-type lateral anchor seems to be a decent option without concern of anchor pull-out even in elderly patients.
Methods: We reviewed 25 patients over 60 who were diagnosed with large to massive RCT and underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in our hospital from March 2017 to February 2021. Preoperative tear size (anterior to posterior, medial to lateral) was measured via preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All 25 patients underwent MRI scanning on postoperative day 1 and at 3 months after surgery. The change of anchor position was measured in axial views on MRI images postoperative day 1 and 3 months after surgery. And it was statistically compared according to bone mineral density (BMD), sex, and number of lateral anchors.
Results: Two MRIs (postoperative day 1 and 3 months) in 25 patients were compared. Anchor pull-out occurred in six patients during 3 months (6.7%), and the mean pull-out length difference was 1.56 mm (range, 0.16–2.58 mm). There was no significant difference in the number of pull-out anchors, degree of pull-out difference by comparing BMD (A, BMD≤–2.5; B, BMD>–2.5), sex, or number of anchors used in each surgery (C, two anchors; D, three anchors) (p>0.05).
Conclusions: Pull-out of screw in-type anchors was rarely observed and the mean pull-out length difference was negligibly small in our study. The screw in-type lateral anchor seems to be a decent option without concern of anchor pull-out even in elderly patients.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Extraction of the pull force from inertial sensors during the pull test for Parkinson’s disease: A reliability study
Journal Of Movement Disorders
2024 .04
-
Delayed Lateral Row Anchor Failure in Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair : A Report of 3 Cases
대한견주관절의학회지
2018 .12
-
Redo pull-through for postoperative complications following pull-through in Hirschsprung disease
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
The effect of the bone marrow aspirate concentrate on arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .03
-
Predictive Model using Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Postoperative Results Considering Preoperative Factors after Rotator Cuff Repair for Cuff Tears.: Pilot Study
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .04
-
Evaluation of Muscular Atrophy and Fatty Infiltration Using Time-zero Magnetic Resonance Imaging as Baseline Data, After Rotator Cuff Repair
대한견주관절의학회지
2019 .06
-
Rotator cuff repair with autologous fascia lata augmentation for biologically unfavorable rotator cuff tear: a minimum two-year follow-up
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .03
-
Comparative Analysis of Effect of Density, Insertion Angle and Reinsertion on Pull-Out Strength of Single and Two Pedicle Screw Constructs Using Synthetic Bone Model
Asian Spine Journal
2016 .01
-
Outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with muscle advancement for large-to-massive rotator cuff tear
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .04
-
The usefulness of postoperative serial sonoelastography in patients with rotator cuff tear: strength and neuromuscular control ability
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .03
-
Comparison of Clinical and Structural Outcomes of Open and Arthroscopic Repair for Massive Rotator Cuff Tear
대한견주관절의학회지
2016 .06
-
Early and Delayed Postoperative Rehabilitation after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes
대한견주관절의학회지
2019 .12
-
Does the Use of Injectable Atelocollagen during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Improve Clinical and Structural Outcomes?
대한견주관절의학회지
2019 .12
-
Rotator cuff repair: what questions are patients asking online and where are they getting their answers?
대한견주관절의학회지
2023 .03
-
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Combined with Muscle Advancement for Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tear
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2017 .03
-
Rotator cuff surgery in geriatric population over 75 years old
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .04
-
Surgical Options for Failed Rotator Cuff Repair, except Arthroplasty: Review of Current Methods
대한견주관절의학회지
2020 .03
-
Evaluation of Deltoid Origin Status Following Open and Arthroscopic Repair of Large Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity-Matched Case-Control Study
대한견주관절의학회지
2020 .03
-
Allogenic Dermal Matrix Augmentation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tear. Does it really work?
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .03
-
Clinical outcomes of rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair according to preoperative tear size and tear progression
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-514-001091944