지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.2
- 수록면
- 104 - 112 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Backgrounds/Aims: In moderate and high-surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis, studies comparing percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) vs. endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (ETGS) vs. endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder stenting (EUGS) are limited. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare efficacy and recurrence of cholecystitis after PC, ETGS, or EUGS during follow-up.
Methods: We reviewed 143 moderate and high-surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis with or without concomitant common bile duct stones who underwent PC, ETGS, or EUGS at our hospital. Technical success rate (TSR), clinical success rate (CSR), and recurrence were compared.
Results: TSR in PC or EUGS group was higher than that in the ETGS group for those with concomitant common bile duct stones (100% vs. 100% vs. 73.2%; p = 0.07) and for those without concomitant common bile duct stones (100% vs. 100% vs. 77.3%; p < 0.001). CSR in ETGS or EUGS group was higher than that in the PC group for those with concomitant common bile duct stones (96.2% vs. 100% vs. 87.5%; p = 0.41) and for those without concomitant common bile duct stones (94.1% vs. 100% vs. 63.0%; p = 0.006). Using Kaplan–Meier analysis, the overall recurrent risk was the highest in the PC group (p = 0.004).
Conclusions: In moderate and high-surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis, EUGS provides significantly higher CSR with comparable TSR to PC. Thus, ETGS should be the first choice in those with concomitant common bile duct stones. Among the three patient groups, those who received PC had the highest rate of recurrence.
Methods: We reviewed 143 moderate and high-surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis with or without concomitant common bile duct stones who underwent PC, ETGS, or EUGS at our hospital. Technical success rate (TSR), clinical success rate (CSR), and recurrence were compared.
Results: TSR in PC or EUGS group was higher than that in the ETGS group for those with concomitant common bile duct stones (100% vs. 100% vs. 73.2%; p = 0.07) and for those without concomitant common bile duct stones (100% vs. 100% vs. 77.3%; p < 0.001). CSR in ETGS or EUGS group was higher than that in the PC group for those with concomitant common bile duct stones (96.2% vs. 100% vs. 87.5%; p = 0.41) and for those without concomitant common bile duct stones (94.1% vs. 100% vs. 63.0%; p = 0.006). Using Kaplan–Meier analysis, the overall recurrent risk was the highest in the PC group (p = 0.004).
Conclusions: In moderate and high-surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis, EUGS provides significantly higher CSR with comparable TSR to PC. Thus, ETGS should be the first choice in those with concomitant common bile duct stones. Among the three patient groups, those who received PC had the highest rate of recurrence.
목차
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Conversion of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy to Endoscopic Gallbladder Stenting by Using the Rendezvous Technique
Clinical Endoscopy
2017 .01
-
Recurrence of common bile duct stones following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: A multicenter study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Management of Difficult Bile Duct Stones by Large Balloon, Cholangioscopy, Enteroscopy and Endosonography
Gut and Liver
2020 .01
-
Current Trends and Practice Patterns for Difficult Bile Ducts Stones in Korea
Gut and Liver
2023 .05
-
Double common bile duct with an ectopic drainage into the stomach
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2015 .03
-
전이성 췌장암 환자에서 병발한 급성 담낭염의 내시경 경유두 담낭 내 스텐트 삽입술 치료
대한내과학회지
2020 .02
-
Three Cases of Difficult Bile Duct Stone Removal by EUS-guided Choledochoduodenostomy
대한췌담도학회지
2020 .01
-
Bile duct injuries after cholecystectomy, analysis of constant risk
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2020 .05
-
Clinical Features and Outcomes of Endoscopic Treatment for Stones in Stemware-Shaped Common Bile Ducts: A Multicenter Data Analysis
Gut and Liver
2015 .01
-
Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis
Clinical Endoscopy
2015 .01
-
Feasibility of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation in Patients with Difficult Bile Duct Stones without Dilatation of the Lower Part of the Extrahepatic Bile Duct
Gut and Liver
2017 .01
-
Practical Approaches for High-Risk Surgical Patients with Acute Cholecystitis: The Percutaneous Approach versus Endoscopic Alternatives
Clinical Endoscopy
2020 .01
-
Isolated aberrant right cysticohepatic duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Evaluation and treatment challenges of a severe postoperative complication associated with an extremely rare anatomical variant
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2020 .05
-
Cholecystectomy for Prevention of Recurrence after Endoscopic Clearance of Bile Duct Stones in Korea
Yonsei Medical Journal
2016 .01
-
Current treatment outcomes of bile duct cancer: Are we improving?
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Surgical Approach Did Not Impact on Oncology Outcome in Middle Bile Duct Cancer : Bile Duct Segmental Resection vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2016 .02
-
Evaluation of gallbladder and common bile duct size and appearance by computed tomography in dogs
Journal of Veterinary Science
2018 .09
-
Identification of risk factors for stone recurrence after laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration of CBD stones
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2016 .04
-
What is the better surgical treatment option for recurrent common bile duct stones?
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2020 .12
-
Utility of liver function tests in acute cholecystitis
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2019 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0