지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is started on the recognition of the problem that legal judgement is often assumed true and the critique of that is deterred. And the overview of some debate about legal fiction are as follows. Legal fiction means the artificial constructs in law and the legal concepts such as corporate entity, rights are in fact legal fiction. Jeremy Bentham believed that legal fiction was necessary evil and Hans Vaihinger expressed his opinion that through legal fiction we could understand truth. Also Lon Fuller thought that legal fiction had the function of appearing true character of law. But Pierre Bourdieu indicates that legal fiction is just illusion that justifies standing legal understanding and CLS criticise that legal fiction becomes the legal myth thus the debate about the law is limited. In case of communitarians, they argue that legal fiction such as neutrality is not desirable therefore legal standards should be made including the value of community. Moreover, post-modernists deconstruct legal value itself supported by legal fiction. And feminist legal theorists show us that legal standards are fiction in reality more accurately. Particularly, the essential legal standard and proclamation, that is social common reasonableness, neutrality/impartiality, truth/perfection are also rather fictional than realistic one construed artificially for convenience of legal analysis. Accordingly, in order to reveal and make legal reality, we should introduce more concrete and diverse narratives into law.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0